A continuum from predictive to online feedback in visuomotor interception

Inmaculada Márquez,Luis Lemus,Mario Treviño

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16628

IF: 3.698

2024-11-29

European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract:Study explored interception behaviour using a falling dot task with varying target trajectory variability and visibility. Low target variability favoured predictive behaviours; high variability led to more reactive, online feedback‐based responses. Higher target variability delayed hand movement onset but not eye movements, weakening gaze–hand position correlation. Participants exhibited consistent interception behaviours across sessions, revealing individual preferences for predictive or reactive strategies. Findings demonstrate adaptive combination of predictive and reactive behaviours in response to external variability during interception. Interception, essential for activities like driving and sports, can be characterized by varying degrees of predictive behaviour. We developed a visually guided task to explore how target predictability and visibility influenced interception actions. The task featured a falling dot influenced by horizontal velocity, gravity and air friction, with predictability manipulated through external forces that altered the target's trajectory. We also introduced spatial occlusion to limit visual information. Our results show that low target variability favoured predictive behaviours, while high variability led to more reactive responses relying on online feedback. Manual responses displayed increased variability with changes in target motion, whereas eye trajectories maintained constant curvature across conditions. Additionally, higher target variability delayed the onset of hand movements but did not affect eye movement onset, making gaze position a poor predictor of hand position. This distinction highlights the different adaptive patterns in hand and eye movements in response to target trajectory changes. Participants maintained stable interception behaviours within and across sessions, indicating individual preferences for either predictive or more reactive actions. Our findings reveal a dynamic interplay between target predictability and interception, illustrating how humans combine predictive and reactive behaviours to manage external variability.

neurosciences