Abstract:We appreciate Dr. Qi and Dr. Niu for their insightful comments on our study, "Exploring the Unknown: Evaluating ChatGPT's Performance in Uncovering Novel Aspects of Plastic Surgery and Identifying Areas for Future Innovation." Their observations underscore significant considerations in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in plastic surgery. We agree with their concern about potential biases in ChatGPT's responses. The AI's frequent attribution of the title "parent of plastic surgery" to Sir Harold Delf Gillies, despite gender-neutral terminology, highlights underlying biases from training data. These biases often reflect historical texts and contemporary writings. Addressing them requires refining training datasets for balanced representation and developing algorithms that adjust dynamically to diverse inputs. The authors also question the criteria ChatGPT uses to identify key contributions to plastic surgery. The AI's focus on microsurgery, minimally invasive techniques, and tissue engineering, while significant, may prioritize keyword prevalence over a holistic evaluation. Enhancing ChatGPT's capabilities through targeted training and input from subject matter experts could improve the AI's ability to generate more balanced outputs. The identified bias favoring reconstructive over cosmetic procedures is another critical point. While reconstructive advancements are transformative, cosmetic surgery also has significant innovations. Ensuring ChatGPT presents a balanced view of both reconstructive and cosmetic advancements is essential. This can be achieved by diversifying training data and calibrating the AI to give equitable weight to different subspecialties within plastic surgery. AI models like ChatGPT are proficient in processing and generating information but lack the human elements of creativity, intuition, and emotional depth critical for groundbreaking innovations. AI should complement, not replace, the expert judgment and innovative thinking of skilled plastic surgeons. Ensuring the accuracy of AI-generated responses is crucial. Clinicians must verify AIgenerated information against established medical literature and clinical guidelines to maintain accuracy in medical practice. Continuous feedback and improvement mechanisms are vital to enhance AI's clinical utility. The improvement of AI in plastic surgery will be driven by active involvement from surgeons, providing comprehensive and balanced data for training to ensure AI systems evolve to support and enhance clinical practice effectively.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: "Dr. AI Will See You Now": How Do ChatGPT-4 Treatment Recommendations Align With Orthopaedic Clinical Practice Guidelines?

"Dr. AI Will See You Now": How Do ChatGPT-4 Treatment Recommendations Align With Orthopaedic Clinical Practice Guidelines?

Editorial Commentary: Studies Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models' Ability to Respond to Questions Are Repetitive and Out-of-Date: Artificial Intelligence Must Now Be Applied to Improve Clinical Practice and Patient Care

Editorial Commentary: Biomedical Research Investigating Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models Needs to Move Beyond Measuring Accuracy and Focus on Improving Patient Care

Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in Orthopaedics and sports medicine

A Comparison of ChatGPT and Expert Consensus Statements on Surgical Site Infection Prevention in High-Risk Paediatric Spine Surgery

Editorial: Uses of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ®—An Update

Assessing the Efficacy of an AI-Powered Chatbot (ChatGPT) in Providing Information on Orthopedic Surgeries: A Comparative Study With Expert Opinion

The Potential of GPT-4 as an AI-Powered Virtual Assistant for Surgeons Specialized in Joint Arthroplasty

Editorial Commentary: The Scope of Medical Research Concerning ChatGPT Remains Limited by Lack of Originality

ChatGPT in orthopedics: a narrative review exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in orthopedic practice

Response to "Letter to the Editor-Exploring the Unknown: Evaluating ChatGPT's Performance in Uncovering Novel Aspects of Plastic Surgery and Identifying Areas for Future Innovation"

Exploring the Role of Open Artificial Intelligence Platform on Surgical Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Case Study of ChatGPT

Meaningless Applications and Misguided Methodologies in Artificial Intelligence-Related Orthopaedic Research Propagates Hype Over Hope

Are orthopaedic surgeons smart enough?

A Blinded Comparison of Three Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots for Orthopaedic Surgery Therapeutic Questions

A practical guide to the implementation of AI in orthopaedic research, Part 6: How to evaluate the performance of AI research?

Editorial Commentary: Experts in Shoulder Surgery Do Not Consistently Detect Artificial Intelligence-Generated Scientific Abstracts

Will ChatGPT/GPT-4 be a Lighthouse to Guide Spinal Surgeons?

Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Performance of ChatGPT on Text and Image Questions on a Complete AAOS Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE)