Abstract:Background: As patients are discharged from the hospital more quickly, the ability to monitor patient recovery between hospital discharge and the first follow-up clinic visit is becoming increasingly important. Despite substantial increase in both internet use and smartphone ownership over the past 5 years, clinicians have been slow to embrace the use of these devices to capture patient recovery information in the period between hospital discharge and the first clinical follow-up appointment. Objective: This study aims to investigate the generalizability of using a web-based platform to capture patient recovery in a broad surgical patient population and compare response rates for 3 different web-based strategies for delivering recovery surveys over the perioperative period: email, SMS text messaging, and a concurrent mixed approach of using both email and SMS text messaging. Methods: Patients undergoing surgeries managed with an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway were asked to participate in a web-based quality assurance monitoring program at the time of their preoperative surgery appointment. Different follow-up methods were implemented over 3 sequential phases. Patients received Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant web-based survey links via email (phase 1), SMS text messaging (phase 2), or concurrently using both email and SMS text messaging (phase 3) using REDCap and Twilio software. Recovery assessments using the established Quality of Recovery-9 instrument were performed 4 days before surgery and at 7 and 30 days postoperatively. Generalizability of the web-based system was examined by comparing characteristics of those who participated versus those who did not. Differences in response rates by the web-based collection method were analyzed using adjusted models. Results: A total of 615 patients were asked to participate, with 526 (85.5%) opting for the follow-up program. Those who opted in were younger, slightly healthier, and more likely to be in a partnership. The concurrent mixed modes method was the most successful for obtaining responses at each time point compared with text or email alone (pre: 119/160, 74.4% vs 116/173, 67.1% vs 56/130, 43.1%, P<.001; 7 days: 115/172, 66.9% vs 82/164, 50.0% vs 59/126, 46.8%, P=.001; 30 days: 152/234, 65.0% vs 52/105, 49.5% vs 53/123, 43.1%, P=.001, respectively). In the adjusted model, the concurrent mixed modes method significantly predicted response compared with using email alone (odds ratio 3.4; P<.001) and SMS text messaging alone (odds ratio 1.9; P<.001). Additional significant predictors of response were race, partnership, and time. Conclusions: For internet users and smartphone owners, electronic capture of recovery surveys appear to be possible through this mechanism. Discrepancies in both inclusion and response rates still exist among certain subgroups of patients, but the concurrent approach of using both email and text messages was the most effective approach to reach the largest number of patients across all subgroups.

Patient‐Initiated Communication After Parotidectomy

Factors Associated With Postoperative Complications in Patients Who Underwent Parotidectomy: A Retrospective Study

Perioperative Patient-Initiated Communication in Gender-Affirming Mastectomy

Risk factors and outcomes after surgery for malignant neoplasm of the parotid gland: An ACS-NSQIP study

Do Postoperative Surgeon Phone Calls Improve Outcomes Following Mandibular Fracture Repair?

Utility of Applying Pressure Dressing Following Parotidectomy Compared to Conventional Dressing: A Benefit or Not?

Patient-Reported Needs in Postoperative Communication After Kidney Stone Surgery

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Periodontal Surgical Procedures

Patient communication following head and neck cancer surgery: a pilot study using electronic speech-generating devices

A Review of Surgical Incisions Used for the Excision of Benign Parotid Tumors

Patient and Provider Perceptions About Communication After Bariatric Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis

Post‐surgical readmission risk factors in otolaryngology/head and neck surgery

Essential elements of surgeon communication impacting patient satisfaction: a systematic review

Quality of Life Outcomes for Parotid Malignancies

Perceived Provision of Perioperative Information and Care by Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study

Volume‐Based Trends in Parotid Surgery

Interprofessional communication in the operating room: a narrative review to advance research and practice

Replacing the postoperative week 1 visit after routine phacoemulsification with a telephone consult

Exploring patient perspectives: orthognathic surgery outcomes and experiences assessed by patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures

Unplanned Return to Hospital After Same Day Oral Cavity Resection: A Dual Institution Study

Comparing Email, SMS, and Concurrent Mixed Modes Approaches to Capture Quality of Recovery in the Perioperative Period: Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Study