Pelvic floor muscle training as treatment for female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cristine Homsi Jorge,Kari Bø,Camila Chiazuto Catai,Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito,Patricia Driusso,Merete Kolberg Tennfjord
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.01.001
IF: 9.8
2024-01-09
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract:Objectives To investigate the efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in treating female sexual dysfunction. Data Sources A systematic review of databases, including PubMed, Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase, BVSalud, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, was performed in July 2021 and updated in May 2023. Study eligibility criteria Full-text articles of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PFMT and no intervention or another conservative treatment in at least one arm to improve women's sexual function or treat sexual dysfunction were included. Study appraisal and synthesis methods The data for this review was extracted and analyzed by two independent reviewers. Data on the characteristics of each intervention was extracted using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT). The risk of bias and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria, respectively. A meta-analysis was conducted considering the post-treatment mean score difference of female sexual function index (FSFI) between the control and treatment groups. Results Twenty-one RCTs were included in this review. The CERT revealed a varying quality of the PFMT protocols. Four studies were included in the meta-analysis showing that PFMT improved arousal (1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13 to 2.85), orgasm (1.55; 95%CI: 0.13 to 2.96), satisfaction (1.46; 95%CI: 0.14 to 2.77), pain (0.74; 95%CI: 0.11 to 1.37), and the FSFI overall score (7.67; 95%CI: 0.77 to 14.57). The GRADE showed a very low certainty of evidence due to the data's high clinical and statistical heterogeneity. No side effects of the interventions were reported. Conclusion This systematic review with meta-analysis showed that PFMT improved female FSFI total score and several subscales; however, the certainty of the evidence is low.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?