Abstract:Background & aims: Utility, a major principle for allocation in the context of transplantation, is questioned in patients with acute-on chronic liver failure grade 3 (ACLF-3) who undergo liver transplantation (LT). We aimed to explore long-term outcomes of patients included in a three-centre retrospective French study published in 2017. Method: All patients with ACLF-3 (n = 73), as well as their transplanted matched controls with ACLF-2 (n = 145), 1 (n = 119) and no ACLF (n = 292), who participated in the Princeps study published in 2017 were included. We explored 5- and 10-year patient and graft survival rates, causes of death and their predictive factors. Results: Median follow-up of patients with ACLF-3 was 7.5 years. At LT, median MELD was 40. In patients with ACLF-3, 2, 1 and no ACLF, 5-year patient survival rates were 72.6% vs. 69.7% vs. 76.4% vs. 77.0%, respectively (p = 0.31). Ten-year patient survival for ACLF-3 was 56.8% and was not different to other groups (p = 0.37). Leading causes of death in patients with ACLF-3 were infections (33.3%) and cardiovascular events (23.3%). After exclusion of early death, UCLA futility risk score, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index and CLIF-C ACLF score were independently associated with 10-year patient survival. Long-term graft survival rates were not different across the groups. Clinical frailty scale and WHO performance status improved over time in patients alive after 5 years. Conclusion: 5- and 10-year patient and graft survival rates were not different in patients with ACLF-3 compared to matched controls. 5-year patient survival is higher than the 50%-70% threshold defining the utility of a liver graft. Efforts should focus on candidate selection based on comorbidities, as well as the prevention of infection and cardiovascular events. Impact and implications: While short-term outcomes following liver transplantation in the most severely ill patients with cirrhosis (acute-on-chronic liver failure grade 3 [ACLF-3]) are known, long-term data are limited, raising questions about the utility of graft allocation in the context of scarce medical resources. This study provides a favourable long-term update, confirming no differences in 5- and 10-year patient and graft survival following liver transplantation in patients with ACLF-3 compared to matched patients with ACLF-2, ACLF-1, and no-ACLF. The study highlights the risk of dying from infection and cardiovascular causes in the long-term and identifies scores including comorbidity evaluation, such as the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, as independently associated with long-term survival. Therefore, physicians should consider the cumulative burden of comorbidities when deciding whether to transplant these patients. Additionally, after transplantation, the study encourages mitigating infectious risk with tailored immunosuppressive regimens and tightly managing cardiovascular risk over time.

Futility and poor outcomes are not the same thing: A clinical perspective of refined outcomes definitions in liver transplantation

Short-term and long-term outcomes of liver transplantation using moderately and severely steatotic donor livers: A systematic review.

[Ten-Year Retrospect of ALPPS in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma:An Eternal Concept with Cautious Technologic Choice].

Long-term outcome following liver transplantation of patients with ACLF grade 3

Outcome Predictors of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: A Narrative Review

Changing landscape of liver transplant in the United States- time for a new innovative way to define and utilize the "non-standard liver allograft"-a proposal

Futile treatment – when is enough, enough?

Trials & Tribulations of Liver Transplantation- are trials now prohibitive without surrogate endpoints?

Textbook Outcomes in Solid Transplantation: A Systematic Review

European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on Outcome Measures in Liver Transplantation According to Value-Based Health Care

Quantitative Methods for Optimizing Patient Outcomes in Liver Transplantation

Defining Benchmarks in Liver Transplantation: A Multicenter Outcome Analysis Determining Best Achievable Results.

Frailty in liver transplantation: Exploring prescribing exercise as medicine to improve patient outcomes

Preventing futile surgery in Intrahepatic and Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas: Can we identify preoperative factors to improve patient selection and optimize outcomes?

Assessment of liver transplant benefit and a novel strategy for liver donor allocation in acute-on-chronic liver failure

Ischemia-free liver transplantation improves the prognosis of recipients using functionally marginal liver grafts

Frailty in liver transplantation: An expert opinion statement from the American Society of Transplantation Liver and Intestinal Community of Practice

End-stage liver failure: filling the treatment gap at the intensive care unit

Developing Consensus-Based Priority Outcome Domains for Trials in Kidney Transplantation: A Multinational Delphi Survey With Patients, Caregivers, and Health Professionals

Personal Opinion on Improving the Outcome of Treatment for Liver Cancer

Liver transplantation provides survival benefit at all levels of frailty: From the Multicenter Functional Assessment in Liver Transplantation Study