Abstract:BACKGROUND:The Lisfranc joint has a complex structure with bony joint surfaces overlapped on the conventional X-ray film, which is diagnosed difficultly. There are less anatomical studies on the Lisfranc ligament, which leads to no accurate anatomical evidence for the repair of Lisfranc ligament injury. OBJECTIVE: To measure the stable structure of Lisfranc ligament at static state so as to provide anatomical <br> evidence for clinical repair of Lisfranc ligament injury. METHODS:(1) Eighteen adult corpse specimens were dissected to observe the morphology of Lisfranc ligament and measure relevant parameters as anatomical group. In the anatomical group, the traveling trend and bony landmarks were confirmed. Another 14 adult corpse specimens were taken as experimental group to fix the Lisfranc ligament using a guide pin and detect the corresponding Lisfranc ligament data based on the above-mentioned parameters. Measured angle and length from the entocuneiform to the second metatarsal base were compared between the two groups. (2) Eight patients with clinicaly confirmed Lisfranc injury were subject to open reduction and internal fixation surgery based on anatomical parameters and positioning method. Patients were folowed up for 8-14 months, and AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Scale was used for functional evaluation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The Lisfranc ligament had two bundles. There was no difference in the morphological measurement between the anatomical and experimental groups (P > 0.05). “Lisfranc channel” was proposed by the authors, which was defined as: the length, width and height from the entocuneiform (with no ligament) to the second metatarsal base were (31.65±2.23) mm, (8.16±1.37) mm, (1.69±0.21) mm, respectively, and the angles with the proximal entocuneiform and plantar side of the proximal entocuneiform were (45.83±6.84)° and (65.11±4.69)°, respectively. Hematoxylin-eosin staining showed the histological characteristics of the Lisfranc ligament with the surrounding tissues and there was a four-layer structure: Lisfranc tendons, tide lines, mineralized fibrocartilage and bone. (2) After treatment, the AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Scale scores were improved to (80.30±4.85) points in the eight patients. Morphological parameters of Lisfranc joint and ligament obtained from anatomical experiments provide anatomical evidence for the repair of Lisfranc injury, and avoid blinded internal fixation that can cause the damage to the starting point of the Lisfranc ligament and impact the restorative effects on Lisfranc injury.

Primary arthrodesis versus open reduction internal fixation for acute Lisfranc injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Definitive Treatments for Lisfranc Injury: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Primary Arthrodesis or Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Primary Arthrodesis versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Lisfranc Joint Fracture-Dislocations in Adults: A Systematic Review

Primary Arthrodesis Compared with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries with the First Tarsometatarsal Joint Dislocation

Arthrodesis or Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Meta-analysis

Arthroplasty versus Internal Fixation for Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- and Long-term Effectiveness.

Lisfranc injuries with dislocation the first tarsometatarsal joint: primary arthrodesis or internal fixation (a randomized controlled trial)

[Effective Analysis of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for the Treatment of Acute Lisfranc Joint Injury].

Open Reduction Internal Fixation vs Primary Arthrodesis for Displaced Lisfranc Injuries: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Functional Outcome and Patient Satisfaction After Primary vs Secondary Arthrodesis for Lisfranc Injuries: Toward a Single-Surgery Approach

Statistical Fragility Analysis of Open Reduction Internal Fixation vs Primary Arthrodesis to Treat Lisfranc Injuries: A Systematic Review

Outcome Comparison of Lisfranc Injuries Treated Through Dorsal Plate Fixation Versus Screw Fixation

Open reduction combined with a variable angle foot plate for treatment of acute Lisfranc fracture-dislocation

Treatment of occult Lisfranc injury with open reduction and internal fixation]

Nonunion rate following primary arthrodesis for acute Lisfranc injuries

The Lisfranc Injury: A Literature Review of Anatomy, Etiology, Evaluation, and Management

Staged Surgical Treatment of Open Lisfranc Fracture Dislocations Using an Adjustable Bilateral External Fixator: A Retrospective Review of 21 Patients.

[Effectiveness of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Acute and Delayed Occult Lisfranc Injuries].

Staged Management of Missed Lisfranc Injuries: A Report of Short‐term Results

Internal fixation implants for Lisfranc ligament injury based on anatomical location