Anti‐factor Xa and activated partial thromboplastin time strategies for unfractionated heparin dosing after HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device implantation

Iris Feng,Paul A. Kurlansky,Tanner R. Powley,Melissa A. Hynds,Christine G. Yang,Andrew Eisenberger,Jonathan M. Hastie,Lauren D. Sutherland,Melana Yuzefpolskaya,Paolo C. Colombo,Gabriel T. Sayer,Nir Y. Uriel,Yoshifumi Naka,Koji Takeda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14885
2024-10-10
Artificial Organs
Abstract:After HeartMate 3 insertion, no statistically significant difference in rates of major bleeding or thromboembolic events was observed among patients at our institution whose heparin was titrated by FXa versus aPTT. This finding held true even after adjusting for patient characteristics relating to coagulation risk. Background No clear guidelines exist for perioperative anticoagulation management after durable left ventricular assist device insertion. In this study, we sought to compare outcomes between anti‐factor Xa (FXa) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in monitoring unfractionated heparin (UFH) dosing after HeartMate 3 (HM3) insertion. Methods This is a single‐center retrospective review of patients who received UFH after HM3 insertion between 01/2020–12/2022. Post‐operative UFH dose was titrated by aPTT goal 45–60 sec (n = 53) or FXa goal 0.1–0.2 U/mL (n = 59). Baseline differences between cohorts were balanced by inverse probability treatment weighting. Results At baseline, unadjusted FXa patients were more likely to be white (47.5% vs. 35.8%, p
engineering, biomedical,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?