Mapping frameworks for synthesizing qualitative evidence in health technology assessment
Marilia Mastrocolla de Almeida Cardoso,Rafael Thomaz Marques,Juliana Machado-Rugolo,Lehana Thabane,Vilanice Alves de Araújo Püschel,Silke Anna Theresa Weber,Rosimary Terezinha Almeida,Graciela Paula do Nascimento Duque,Cristiane Cardoso De Paula,Luciane Cruz Lopes,Mariana Gabriel,Sybelle Drumond,Clarice Maria Rodrigues,Meredith Vanstone
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324000369
2024-11-14
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Abstract:Objectives Health Technology Assessment (HTA) practitioners recognize the significance of qualitative methodologies that focus on how a technology is feasible, meaningfulness, acceptable, and equitable. This mapping aimed to delineate the frameworks employed to synthesize qualitative evidence and assess the quality of synthesis in HTA . Methods Mapping was conducted using Medline, LILACS, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, JBI, and ScienceDirect databases. Gray literature searches included PROQUEST, Open Grey, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health's Grey Matters, Google Scholar, and HTA agency websites. The inclusion criteria were centered on global qualitative evidence synthesis frameworks. The data are presented in the tables. Results Of the 2054 articles, 31 were included, mostly from Europe. Guide was the type of document more cited, and most authors are from HTA agencies and universities. Incorporating both patient and family perspectives is the most cited reason for include qualitative evidence. Regardless of the framework or tool, SPICE was the main acronym, and RETREAT was preferred for approach selection. Thematic synthesis dominated analytic methods, and CASP was the primary quality appraisal tool. GRADE-CERQual graded evidence synthesis, with ENTREQ as the top reporting guidance. The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework was mentioned for recommendations. Conclusion This mapping highlights the movement incorporate qualitative evidence in HTA employing specific frameworks. Despite the similarities among documents, most of them describe part of the process to synthesize qualitative evidence. Standardizing procedures to incorporate qualitative evidence into HTA can enhance decision-making. These findings offer essential considerations for HTA practice.
public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,medical informatics