Prioritizing Data Privacy and Security in Pediatric AI—Reply

Jessica L. Handley,Christoph U. Lehmann,Raj M. Ratwani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.3086
2024-10-08
JAMA Pediatrics
Abstract:In Reply We appreciate Wu and Lin's comments regarding our article. 1 They highlight important data privacy and security concerns regarding safe and equitable use of artificial intelligence (AI) in pediatric care. We agree pediatric patients are a vulnerable population distinctly different from adult patients and require unique data privacy and security considerations. 2 Further, pediatric patients may not understand AI algorithm development and its effect on diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. The principle of autonomy refers to the notion that patients deserve to assess their treatment options and may forgo or choose a treatment. With pediatric patients' limited capacity to consent, additional ethical burden must be placed on clinicians and guardians in design and evaluation of AI solutions, including assurance of the just application of AI and beneficence and absence of malfeasance in its designers' intent. Also, medicolegal considerations in pediatric populations will require that developers and implementers of AI in pediatric populations maintain records for the duration of the statute of limitation beyond the age of the patient's maturity.
pediatrics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?