Establishing the distribution of cerebrovascular resistance using computational fluid dynamics and 4D flow MRI

Axel Vikström,Petter Holmlund,Madelene Holmgren,Anders Wåhlin,Laleh Zarrinkoob,Jan Malm,Anders Eklund
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65431-4
IF: 4.6
2024-06-27
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Cerebrovascular resistance (CVR) regulates blood flow in the brain, but little is known about the vascular resistances of the individual cerebral territories. We present a method to calculate these resistances and investigate how CVR varies in the hemodynamically disturbed brain. We included 48 patients with stroke/TIA (29 with symptomatic carotid stenosis). By combining flow rate (4D flow MRI) and structural computed tomography angiography (CTA) data with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) we computed the perfusion pressures out from the circle of Willis, with which CVR of the MCA, ACA, and PCA territories was estimated. 56 controls were included for comparison of total CVR (tCVR). CVR were 33.8 ± 10.5, 59.0 ± 30.6, and 77.8 ± 21.3 mmHg s/ml for the MCA, ACA, and PCA territories. We found no differences in tCVR between patients, 9.3 ± 1.9 mmHg s/ml, and controls, 9.3 ± 2.0 mmHg s/ml (p = 0.88), nor in territorial CVR in the carotid stenosis patients between ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres. Territorial resistance associated inversely to territorial brain volume (p < 0.001). These resistances may work as reference values when modelling blood flow in the circle of Willis, and the method can be used when there is need for subject-specific analysis.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to establish the distribution of cerebrovascular resistance (CVR) in different brain regions, especially for the patient group with a history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke, and whether there are lateral differences in the cerebrovascular resistance of these patients due to carotid artery stenosis. In addition, the study also explored the relationship between cerebrovascular resistance and brain volume to verify the feasibility of using brain volume distribution as a proxy for resistance distribution. ### Research Background The balanced distribution of cerebral blood flow is crucial for maintaining normal brain function. The distribution of cerebral blood flow is closely related to the blood pressure that drives the blood flow (i.e., perfusion pressure) and the blood flow resistance (CVR) of the cerebral arteries. Cerebral autoregulation regulates CVR by changing the diameters of arterioles and small arteries to ensure stable blood flow when the perfusion pressure changes. At the same time, changes in metabolic demands will also cause changes in CVR through neurovascular coupling to ensure an adequate blood supply. Therefore, deviations in CVR may reflect disorders or exhaustion of these regulatory processes. In addition, damage to vascular structure and function is becoming increasingly important in the development of cognitive diseases, making CVR and its distribution a potential screening tool for early cognitive decline. Finally, the vascular resistance in different brain regions also plays a key role in mathematical modeling and predicting cerebral blood flow. ### Research Methods The research team combined 4D - flow MRI data and structural computed tomography angiography (CTA) data and used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to calculate the pressure flowing out of the circle of Willis, thereby estimating the CVR in the middle cerebral artery (MCA), anterior cerebral artery (ACA), and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) regions. The study included 48 patients with a history of TIA or stroke (29 of whom had symptomatic carotid artery stenosis) and 56 elderly people in the control group. ### Main Findings 1. **Overall CVR**: There was no significant difference in the total CVR (tCVR) between the patient group and the control group, which were 9.3 ± 1.9 mmHg s/ml and 9.3 ± 2.0 mmHg s/ml respectively. 2. **Regional CVR**: The CVR in the MCA, ACA, and PCA regions were 33.8 ± 10.5 mmHg s/ml, 59.0 ± 30.6 mmHg s/ml, and 77.8 ± 21.3 mmHg s/ml respectively. There were significant differences between the regions, but there was no significant difference between the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres in the carotid artery stenosis patient group. 3. **Relationship between CVR and Brain Volume**: The total brain volume was significantly positively correlated with the total conductance (i.e., the reciprocal of CVR) (r = 0.37, p = 0.01). However, when analyzing the conductance and brain volume in each region, no significant association was found. ### Conclusions This study proposes a method based on individual - specific data to determine the CVR in brain regions without relying on flow distribution assumptions. Despite significant carotid artery stenosis and reduced blood flow, the CVR of patients remained at a relatively stable level, indicating that the impact of regional autoregulation may be lower than expected. Future work can use these resistance values as references for blood flow modeling in the circle of Willis and use this method when individual - specific analysis is required.