Harmonization of resting-state functional MRI data across multiple imaging sites via the separation of site differences into sampling bias and measurement bias
Ayumu Yamashita,Noriaki Yahata,Takashi Itahashi,Giuseppe Lisi,Takashi Yamada,Naho Ichikawa,Masahiro Takamura,Yujiro Yoshihara,Akira Kunimatsu,Naohiro Okada,Hirotaka Yamagata,Koji Matsuo,Ryuichiro Hashimoto,Go Okada,Yuki Sakai,Jun Morimoto,Jin Narumoto,Yasuhiro Shimada,Kiyoto Kasai,Nobumasa Kato,Hidehiko Takahashi,Yasumasa Okamoto,Saori C. Tanaka,Mitsuo Kawato,Okito Yamashita,Hiroshi Imamizu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000042
IF: 9.8
2019-04-18
PLoS Biology
Abstract:When collecting large amounts of neuroimaging data associated with psychiatric disorders, images must be acquired from multiple sites because of the limited capacity of a single site. However, site differences represent a barrier when acquiring multisite neuroimaging data. We utilized a traveling-subject dataset in conjunction with a multisite, multidisorder dataset to demonstrate that site differences are composed of biological sampling bias and engineering measurement bias. The effects on resting-state functional MRI connectivity based on pairwise correlations because of both bias types were greater than or equal to psychiatric disorder differences. Furthermore, our findings indicated that each site can sample only from a subpopulation of participants. This result suggests that it is essential to collect large amounts of neuroimaging data from as many sites as possible to appropriately estimate the distribution of the grand population. Finally, we developed a novel harmonization method that removed only the measurement bias by using a traveling-subject dataset and achieved the reduction of the measurement bias by 29% and improvement of the signal-to-noise ratios by 40%. Our results provide fundamental knowledge regarding site effects, which is important for future research using multisite, multidisorder resting-state functional MRI data.Recently, the importance of acquiring and sharing large amounts of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data from multiple geographical locations or sites has increased. However, differences in the data acquired from multiple sites create heterogeneities that present a barrier to the analysis. To properly manage these heterogeneous multisite data, it is important to have a deeper understanding of the origin of these between-site differences and to harmonize rs-fMRI data among sites. In this study, we demonstrate that site differences are composed of biological sampling bias (differences between the participant groups) and engineering measurement bias (differences in the properties of the MRI scanners used). We found that the effects of both types of bias on rs-fMRI functional connectivity were greater than or equal to those driven by psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, our results identified the specific properties of MRI scanners that affect the rs-fMRI connectivity. To overcome the limitations associated with site differences, we used a traveling-subject dataset, wherein multiple participants travel to multiple sites to assess measurement bias by controlling for participant effects between sites. Our results indicated that the traveling-subject dataset can help the proper harmonization of rs-fMRI data between sites.
biochemistry & molecular biology,biology