Social networking sites: a powerful tool for co-design and discussion group research

Sara Holton,Rochelle Wynne
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2024.2357347
2024-05-29
Contemporary Nurse
Abstract:Globally almost five billion people engage with an average of 6.7 social media platforms daily (Dixon, Citation 2023 ). Networking sites such as Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, TikTok, Twitter and LinkedIn provide avenues for targeted communication and information sharing. In Australia alone, there are over 21 million active social media users who spend an average of two hours a day on social media (Correll, Citation 2024 ). Age differences are apparent in platform selection, with younger people more likely to use sites such as Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok, and older people Facebook, LinkedIn and YouTube (Correll, Citation 2024 ). In the context of ensuring equity, diversity and inclusion in research, an improved understanding of social networking and the possibilities it provides for research is warranted.
nursing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper primarily explores the application of social networking platforms (such as Facebook, WhatsApp, etc.) in research, particularly their potential in the field of healthcare research. Specifically, the authors discuss the advantages and challenges of using social networking platforms as online discussion groups and co-design tools. ### Main Issues The paper attempts to address the following key issues: 1. **How to use social networking platforms for research**: The authors point out that social networking platforms can be used for recruiting participants, collecting data, delivering interventions, and disseminating research findings. However, these platforms are currently rarely used as the primary platform for data collection. 2. **Overcoming obstacles in traditional research**: Social networking platforms can reduce various barriers to participating in research, such as geographical location restrictions and scheduling difficulties. This is particularly applicable to hard-to-reach populations, such as shift-working nurses, parents with childcare responsibilities, or individuals with health conditions that prevent them from attending face-to-face discussions. 3. **Improving research efficiency and cost-effectiveness**: Using social networking platforms can save costs as there is no need to rent physical venues, and participants can join discussions at their convenience. Additionally, during the pandemic, this approach can reduce the risk of cross-infection. 4. **Exploring the impact of non-verbal communication**: Although social networking platforms may not capture facial expressions and body language, participants can convey emotions through emojis, which also requires further research. ### Conclusion The paper emphasizes the practicality and potential of social networking platforms in research, especially in overcoming various limitations of traditional research methods. Despite some potential disadvantages, such as issues with non-verbal communication, overall, this new research method offers new possibilities for healthcare research. Future studies should further validate the effectiveness and reliability of this approach.