Abstract:Background: Medication errors and associated adverse drug events (ADE) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In recent years, the prevention of medication errors has become a high priority in healthcare systems. In order to improve medication safety, computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) are increasingly being integrated into the medication process. Accordingly, a growing number of studies have investigated the medication safety-related effectiveness of CDSS. However, the outcome measures used are heterogeneous, leading to unclear evidence. The primary aim of this study is to summarize and categorize the outcomes used in interventional studies evaluating the effects of CDSS on medication safety in primary and long-term care. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library for interventional studies evaluating the effects of CDSS targeting medication safety and patient-related outcomes. We extracted methodological characteristics, outcomes and empirical findings from the included studies. Outcomes were assigned to three main categories: process-related, harm-related, and cost-related. Risk of bias was assessed using the Evidence Project risk of bias tool. Results: Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Almost all studies (n = 31) used process-related outcomes, followed by harm-related outcomes (n = 11). Only three studies used cost-related outcomes. Most studies used outcomes from only one category and no study used outcomes from all three categories. The definition and operationalization of outcomes varied widely between the included studies, even within outcome categories. Overall, evidence on CDSS effectiveness was mixed. A significant intervention effect was demonstrated by nine of fifteen studies with process-related primary outcomes (60%) but only one out of five studies with harm-related primary outcomes (20%). The included studies faced a number of methodological problems that limit the comparability and generalizability of their results. Conclusions: Evidence on the effectiveness of CDSS is currently inconclusive due in part to inconsistent outcome definitions and methodological problems in the literature. Additional high-quality studies are therefore needed to provide a comprehensive account of CDSS effectiveness. These studies should follow established methodological guidelines and recommendations and use a comprehensive set of harm-, process- and cost-related outcomes with agreed-upon and consistent definitions. Prospero registration: CRD42023464746.

Development and validation of a clinical decision support system to prevent anticoagulant duplications

Efficiency of computerized clinical decision support systems involving anticoagulants: A flashmob study in Dutch hospital pharmacies

Reducing Therapeutic Duplication in Inpatient Medication Orders

The effect of computerised decision support alerts tailored to intensive care on the administration of high-risk drug combinations, and their monitoring: a cluster randomised stepped-wedge trial

Ability of machine-learning based clinical decision support system to reduce alert fatigue, wrong-drug errors, and alert users about look alike, sound alike medication

Drug-drug interaction checking assisted by clinical decision support: a return on investment analysis

A machine learning–based clinical decision support system to identify prescriptions with a high risk of medication error

Development and retrospective evaluation of a clinical decision support system for the efficient detection of drug-related problems by clinical pharmacists

Overall performance of a drug–drug interaction clinical decision support system: quantitative evaluation and end-user survey

A critical evaluation of clinical decision support for the detection of drug–drug interactions

Universal EHRs Clinical Decision Support for Thromboprophylaxis in Medical Inpatients: A Cluster Randomized Trial

Implementation of a clinical decision support system for the optimization of antidiabetic drug orders by pharmacists

Implementing pharmacist-prescriber collaboration to improve evidence-based anticoagulant use: a randomized trial

Impact of a clinical decision support system on identifying drug-related problems and making recommendations to providers during community pharmacist-led medication reviews in Ontario, Canada: A pilot study

Do clinical decision support systems for prescribing improve patient safety? a systematic literature review

Optimising computerised decision support to transform medication safety and reduce prescriber burden: study protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation of drug–drug interaction alerts

Adoption of antithrombotic stewardship and utilization of clinical decision support systems—A questionnaire-based survey in Dutch hospitals

How intervention studies measure the effectiveness of medication safety-related clinical decision support systems in primary and long-term care: a systematic review

Clinical decision support system supported interventions in hospitalized older patients: a matter of natural course and adequate timing

Evaluation of an automated surveillance system using trigger alerts to prevent adverse drug events in the intensive care unit and general ward

Clinical decision support to reduce unnecessary diagnostic testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia