Abstract:Objective: To assess the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive technology with trajectory screw fixation for fragility fractures of pelvic(FFP). Methods: A retrospective case control study was performed to analyze the clinical data of 35 patients with FFP who were treated and followed up between January 2016 and December 2019. There were 12 males and 23 females, aged from 65 to 99 years with an average of(75.4±7.8) years old. There were 13 cases of type Ⅱb, 7 cases of type Ⅱc, 8 cases of type Ⅲa, 2 cases of type Ⅲb, 2 cases of type Ⅲc, 1 case of type Ⅳb, and 2 cases of type Ⅳc according to Rommens FFP comprehensive classification. All patients received the treatment of minimally invasive technology with trajectory screws fixation. According to the different methods of anterior pelvic ring fixation, FFP patients were divided into two groups:12 cases were fixed with the pedicle screw rod system in the anterior pelvic subcutaneous internal fixator (INFIX) group;23 cases were fixed with hollow screws of the pubic symphysis, superior ramus of pubis or acetabular anterior column in the screw group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, length of hospital stay, cost of internal fixation, pre- and post-operative visual analogue scale(VAS) were compared between the two groups. The fracture reduction quality was evaluated according to the Matta criteria, and the clinical function was evaluated by the Majeed functional scoring system respectively. Results: All patients were followed up for 12 to 39(16.5±5.4) months after surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, and length of hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05). As for the cost of internal fixation, the cost of internal fixation in the screw group [2 914 (2 914, 4 371) yuan] was significantly lower than that of the INFIX group [6 205 (6 205, 6 205) yuan] (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS assessment at admission, 1 week, and 3 months after surgery between the two groups(P>0.05). However, the VAS assessment at 1 week and 3 months after surgery of the two groups were significantly better than those at admission(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the quality of fracture reduction after the operation and the efficacy evaluation at the last follow-up between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion: For the treatment of fragility fractures, minimally invasive technology with trajectory screw fixation can achieve good clinical efficacy. It has the advantages of being relatively minimally invasive, less bleeding, relieving the pain. It deserves clinical application.

Evaluation of a treatment protocol based on conservative therapy for fragility fractures of the pelvis

Conservative treatment of fragility fracture of the pelvis: A retrospective study

Conservative or operative therapy in patients with a fragility fracture of the pelvis: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial

Prevalence of fracture progression in fragility fractures of the pelvis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis

Surgical treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: short-term outcomes of 42 patients

Implementation of a standardized protocol to manage elderly patients with low energy pelvic fractures: can service improvement be expected?

Optimization of transdisciplinary management of elderly with femur proximal extremity fracture: A patient-tailored plan from orthopaedics to rehabilitation

[Conservative fracture treatment in old people]

[Effect analysis of trajectory screw technique in fragility fracture of pelvic ring]

Comparison of the Clinical Effect of Surgery and Conservative Therapy on the Elderly Patients with Acetabular Fractures

Efficacy of Fragility Fracture Integrated Rehabilitation Management in Older Adults With Hip Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 1-Year Follow-Up

Fragility fractures of the pelvis: First 48 cases of surgical treatment at a level 1 trauma center in France

Therapeutic Intervention for Osteoporosis of Surgical Cases With Non-Vertebral Fractures for Three Years in a Newly Established Rural Hospital in Japan

Epidemiology of fragility fractures and fall prevention in the elderly: a systematic review of the literature

Orthogeriatric co-management in pelvic and acetabular fractures

Minimally invasive posterior locked compression plate osteosynthesis shows excellent results in elderly patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis

The effect of a multidisciplinary approach on geriatric hip fractures in Japan

Effects of a Rehabilitation Program Combined with Pain Management That Targets Pain Perception and Activity Avoidance in Older Patients with Acute Vertebral Compression Fracture: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Optimized clinical practice for superaged patients with hip fracture: significance of damage control and enhanced recovery program

Surgical treatment of femoral head fractures