Naturalistic assessments in virtual reality and in real life help resolve the age-prospective memory paradox

Nathan S. Rose,Joseph M. Saito

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2024.2315791

2024-02-18

Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition

Abstract:Cognitive aging researchers have long reported "paradoxical" age differences in prospective memory (PM), with age deficits in laboratory settings and age benefits (or no deficits) in real-world settings. We propose a theoretical account that explains this "age-PM-paradox" as a consequence of both methodological factors and developmental changes in cognitive abilities and personality traits. To test this account, young and older adults performed a series of naturalistic PM tasks in the lab and real world. Age-related PM deficits were observed in both lab-based tasks where demands were implemented using virtual reality and in-person role-playing. In contrast, older adults performed equal to or better than young adults on both real-world tasks, where demands were implemented in participants' daily lives. Consistent with our proposed account, an index of these "paradoxical" effects was partially predicted by age-related differences in working memory, vigilance, agreeableness, and neuroticism, whose predictive utility varied across task settings.

psychology, experimental, developmental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to address is the so-called "age-prospective memory paradox." This paradox refers to the phenomenon where older adults perform worse on prospective memory (the ability to remember to perform a specific task at a future point in time) in laboratory settings, but perform as well as or even better than younger adults in real-life situations. The researchers aim to explain this paradox and explore its underlying causes through naturalistic assessment methods, including virtual reality and real-life tasks.

Specifically, the researchers propose a theoretical framework suggesting that this paradox is the result of multiple factors working together, including:

1. **Methodological Factors**: Differences in the design of laboratory tasks and real-world tasks may lead to different outcomes. For example, laboratory tasks are often based on time intervals, whereas real-world tasks rely more on event cues.
2. **Changes in Cognitive Abilities**: As people age, changes in cognitive abilities such as working memory and alertness may affect prospective memory performance.
3. **Developmental Changes in Personality Traits**: Changes in certain personality traits (e.g., conscientiousness, agreeableness) in older adults may also influence their performance in different environments.

To test these hypotheses, the researchers designed a series of naturalistic prospective memory tasks, including virtual reality tasks and real-life tasks, and tested both young and older participants. Through these tasks, the researchers hope to better understand why older adults exhibit different prospective memory abilities in laboratory and real-world settings.