Abstract:Background: Local government has become a key constituent for addressing health inequalities and influencing the health of individuals and communities in England. Lauded as an effective approach to tackle the multiple determinants of health, there are concerns that generating and utilising research evidence to inform decision-making and action is a challenge. This research was conducted in a local authority situated in the north of England and addressed the research question - 'What is the capacity to collaborate and deliver research?'. The study explored the assets that exist to foster a stronger research culture, identified barriers and opportunities for developing research capacity, and how a sustainable research system could be developed to impact on local residents' health and reduce health inequalities. Methods: This was a qualitative study utilising semi-structured interviews and focus groups. The study used an embedded researcher (ER) who was digitally embedded within the local authority for four months to conduct the data collection. Senior Managers were purposively sampled from across the local authority to take part in interviews. Three focus groups included representation from across the local authority. Framework analysis was conducted to develop the themes which were informed by the Research Capacity Development framework. Results: Tensions between research led decision making and the political and cultural context of local government were identified as a barrier to developing research which addressed health inequalities. Research was not prioritised through an organisational strategy and was led sporadically by research active employees. A recognition across leaders that a culture shift to an organisation which used research evidence to develop policy and commission services was needed. Building relationships and infrastructure across local government, place-based collaborators and academic institutions was required. The embedded researcher approach is one method of developing these relationships. The study identifies the strengths and assets that are embedded in the organisational make-up and the potential areas for development. Conclusion: Research leadership is required in local government to create a culture of evidence-based principles and policy. The embedded research model has high utility in gaining depth of information and recognising contextual and local factors which would support research capacity development.

Bringing lay knowledge into place-making? A critical exploration of community review panels in London and Southeast England

What is known about what works in community-involved decision-making relating to urban green and blue spaces? A realist review protocol

Real Participation or the Tyranny of Participatory Practice? Public Art and Community Involvement in the Regeneration of the Raploch, Scotland

Urban planning, public participation and digital technology: App development as a method of generating citizen involvement in local planning processes

Engaging people with lived experiences on community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: a scoping review protocol

Involvement of Lay Assessors in the Inspection and Regulation of Public Services: A Systematic Review

“Critical Agents of Change?”: Opportunities and Limits to Children’s Participation in Urban Planning

Changing the culture: a qualitative study exploring research capacity in local government

Participative Urban Renewal? Disability, Community, and Partnership in New Labour's Urban Policy

Opportunities and Challenges of Municipal Planning in Shaping Vertical Neighbourhoods in Greater London

Social value and the disposal of public land for community-led housing: applying a multi-level perspective to the case of Bristol

Exploring member perspectives on participation on child welfare Citizen Review Panels: A national study

Evaluating Community Co-Design, Maintenance and Ownership of Green Spaces in Underserved Communities Using Participatory Research

Can Place-Based Modifications Make a Difference to Local Health Inequalities in Urban Essex: An Evaluation Protocol

Participatory design for democratic innovation: participation requests and community empowerment in Scotland

Exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in England: a mixed-methods study

Politicising the landscape: a theoretical contribution towards the development of participation in landscape planning

Enhancing Citizen Participation: Panel Designs, Perspectives, and Policy Formation

An evaluation of a public partnership project between academic institutions and young people with Black African, Asian and Caribbean heritage

Community-Partnered Research appraisal tool for conducting, reporting and assessing community-based research

Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review