Abstract:RowHammer is a circuit-level DRAM vulnerability where repeatedly accessing (i.e., hammering) a DRAM row can cause bit flips in physically nearby rows. The RowHammer vulnerability worsens as DRAM cell size and cell-to-cell spacing shrink. Recent studies demonstrate that modern DRAM chips, including chips previously marketed as RowHammer-safe, are even more vulnerable to RowHammer than older chips such that the required hammer count to cause a bit flip has reduced by more than 10X in the last decade. Therefore, it is essential to develop a better understanding and in-depth insights into the RowHammer vulnerability of modern DRAM chips to more effectively secure current and future systems. Our goal in this paper is to provide insights into fundamental properties of the RowHammer vulnerability that are not yet rigorously studied by prior works, but can potentially be i) exploited to develop more effective RowHammer attacks or ii) leveraged to design more effective and efficient defense mechanisms. To this end, we present an experimental characterization using 248 DDR4 and 24 DDR3 modern DRAM chips from four major DRAM manufacturers demonstrating how the RowHammer effects vary with three fundamental properties: 1) DRAM chip temperature, 2) aggressor row active time, and 3) victim DRAM cell’s physical location. Among our 16 new observations, we highlight that a RowHammer bit flip 1) is very likely to occur in a bounded range, specific to each DRAM cell (e.g., 5.4% of the vulnerable DRAM cells exhibit errors in the range to ), 2) is more likely to occur if the aggressor row is active for longer time (e.g., RowHammer vulnerability increases by 36% if we keep a DRAM row active for 15 column accesses), and 3) is more likely to occur in certain physical regions of the DRAM module under attack (e.g., 5% of the rows are 2x more vulnerable than the remaining 95% of the rows). Our study has important practical implications on future RowHammer attacks and defenses. We describe and analyze the implications of our new findings by proposing three future RowHammer attack and five future RowHammer defense improvements.

Nethammer: Inducing Rowhammer Faults through Network Requests

TeleHammer: A Formal Model of Implicit Rowhammer

PThammer: Cross-User-Kernel-Boundary Rowhammer through Implicit Accesses

SoK: Rowhammer on Commodity Operating Systems

TRRespass: Exploiting the Many Sides of Target Row Refresh

RowHammer: A Retrospective

Understanding Rowhammer Attacks through the Lens of a Unified Reference Framework

Rowhammer Attacks in Dynamic Random-Access Memory and Defense Methods

Uncovering In-DRAM RowHammer Protection Mechanisms: A New Methodology, Custom RowHammer Patterns, and Implications

GuardION: Practical Mitigation of DMA-Based Rowhammer Attacks on ARM

A Deeper Look into RowHammer’s Sensitivities: Experimental Analysis of Real DRAM Chips and Implications on Future Attacks and Defenses

DRAM-Profiler: An Experimental DRAM RowHammer Vulnerability Profiling Mechanism

Fundamentally Understanding and Solving RowHammer

SoftTRR: Protect Page Tables against Rowhammer Attacks using Software-only Target Row Refresh

LeapFrog: The Rowhammer Instruction Skip Attack

GbHammer: Malicious Inter-process Page Sharing by Hammering Global Bits in Page Table Entries

BitMine: an End-to-End Tool for Detecting Rowhammer Vulnerability.

FAULT+PROBE: A Generic Rowhammer-based Bit Recovery Attack

Preventing Rowhammer Exploits via Low-Cost Domain-Aware Memory Allocation

SpyHammer: Understanding and Exploiting RowHammer under Fine-Grained Temperature Variations

RowHammer: Reliability Analysis and Security Implications