2 The Harvard College Economist Thank You

Gail,Brooke M. Wagner,Oskin,Matthew Rosenberg,C. Goldin,A. Taub,E. Oster

Abstract:This paper evaluates the profitability of risk arbitrage in Europe by measuring returns to investing in 633 mergers from 1989 to 1999. Results indicate that European risk arbitrage generates small positive returns when transaction and borrowing costs are excluded and returns fall to levels not statistically different from zero when these costs are included. Results from investing in British deals are particularly impacted by transaction and borrowing costs relative to deals in the other countries. In a Capital Asset Pricing Model regression, European risk arbitrage returns are not statistically different from a risk-adjusted European market return, though cash deals have statistically significant positive alpha when transaction and borrowing costs are excluded, and stock deals have significant negative alpha when these costs are included. Returns are also analyzed in light of two recent papers focusing on risk arbitrage as an investment strategy in the United States. The first paper suggests that transaction and other practical costs have a statistically negative effect on risk arbitrage returns. European results would confirm this transaction cost theory. The second paper posits that transaction costs do not affect returns, but that “limited arbitrage” does: when the supply of dedicated risk arbitrage capital falls, subsequent returns rise, and vice versa. The European returns provide some indirect support for this theory. Finally, the results are compared to U.S. returns calculated in these two papers. European risk arbitrage appears to underperform significantly its U.S. counterpart.

Economics