"The very process made me happier!" Is pleasure research an affective intervention?
Desirée Kozlowski Stephen C. Provost Margaret L. Kern a Psychology,Southern Cross University,Coffs Harbour,New South Wales,Australiab Faculty of Education,University of Melbourne,Victoria,Australia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2024.2394441
2024-08-24
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Abstract:Participating in research on aversive topics can produce discomfort. However, the affective consequences of taking part in hedonic research are unknown. Positive psychology interventions (PPIs) harness personal strengths, values, beliefs, and emotions to promote optimal functioning. A growing body of evidence suggests they can be effective in addressing a range of mental health conditions and promoting well-being. Savoring is one of the more potent classes of PPIs, and even brief interventions can shift positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) in directions conducive to greater well-being. In a study of 1,804 Australian adults, we found that responding to an online survey asking about pleasure produced a small but significant increase in PA and a substantial reduction in NA. The magnitude of the effects was comparable with other published PPIs. We briefly discuss this finding in the context of emotional sensibility and consider the nexus between intervention and research.
psychology, multidisciplinary