Lung Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Late Sequelae of COVID-19 Pneumonia—A Comparison with Chest Computed Tomography: A Prospective Study

Katarzyna Zimna,Małgorzata Sobiecka,Jacek Wakuliński,Dorota Wyrostkiewicz,Ewa Jankowska,Monika Szturmowicz,Witold Z. Tomkowski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/v16060905
2024-06-03
Viruses
Abstract:The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic allowed physicians to gain experience in lung ultrasound (LUS) during the acute phase of the disease. However, limited data are available on LUS findings during the recovery phase. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of LUS to assess lung involvement in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome. This study prospectively enrolled 72 patients who underwent paired LUS and chest CT scans (112 pairs including follow-up). The most frequent CT findings were ground glass opacities (83.3%), subpleural lines (72.2%), traction bronchiectasis (37.5%), and consolidations (31.9%). LUS revealed irregular pleural lines as a common abnormality initially (56.9%), along with subpleural consolidation >2.5 mm ≤10 mm (26.5%) and B-lines (26.5%). A strong correlation was found between LUS score, calculated by artificial intelligence percentage involvement in ground glass opacities described in CT (r = 0.702, p < 0.05). LUS score was significantly higher in the group with fibrotic changes compared to the non-fibrotic group with a mean value of 19.4 ± 5.7 to 11 ± 6.6, respectively (p < 0.0001). LUS might be considered valuable for examining patients with persistent symptoms after recovering from COVID-19 pneumonia. Abnormalities identified through LUS align with CT scan findings; thus, LUS might potentially reduce the need for frequent chest CT examinations.
virology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether lung ultrasound (LUS) can be an effective alternative or complementary tool to chest computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of COVID - 19 pneumonia sequelae. Specifically, the study aims to: 1. **Evaluate the application value of LUS in detecting lung lesions in patients with post - COVID - 19 syndrome**: The study explores the accuracy of LUS in assessing COVID - 19 sequelae by comparing the results of LUS and CT. 2. **Describe the association between LUS and CT results**: The study analyzes the correlation between the LUS score and the percentage of ground - glass opacities (GGOs) in CT scans to determine the potential role of LUS in monitoring disease progression. 3. **Determine the effectiveness of the LUS score in screening for persistent lung abnormalities**: Through ROC curve analysis, the study determines the optimal threshold of the LUS score in detecting CT images with more than 10% GGOs. ### Research background - **COVID - 19 sequelae**: Many COVID - 19 patients still have persistent symptoms and imaging changes, such as ground - glass opacities, traction bronchiectasis, and fibrosis, after the acute phase. - **Existing diagnostic methods**: Chest CT is considered the "gold standard" for assessing lung lesions, but frequent use of CT may increase the risk of radiation exposure. Therefore, it is particularly important to find a non - invasive, convenient, and effective alternative method. - **Advantages of LUS**: LUS is a radiation - free, bedside - operable, and low - cost examination method. It has been widely used in the acute phase of COVID - 19, but its application in the recovery phase still needs further verification. ### Research methods - **Research design**: This is a prospective observational study. A total of 72 patients with post - COVID - 19 syndrome were included, and 112 pairs of LUS and CT examinations were performed. - **Data collection**: The clinical characteristics of patients, the imaging results of LUS and CT were recorded, and an AI tool was used to quantify the percentage of GGOs in CT. - **Statistical analysis**: The relationship between the LUS score and the percentage of CT GGOs was analyzed by Pearson correlation coefficient, and the sensitivity and specificity of LUS in detecting GGOs were evaluated by ROC curve. ### Main findings - **Correlation between LUS and CT**: There is a strong positive correlation between the LUS score and the percentage of GGOs in CT (r = 0.702, p < 0.05). - **ROC curve analysis**: A LUS score of 13 is the optimal threshold for detecting more than 10% GGOs, with high sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 0.948). - **Fibrosis changes**: In patients with fibrosis changes, the LUS score is significantly higher than that in patients without fibrosis changes. ### Conclusion LUS shows high accuracy in assessing lung lesions in patients with post - COVID - 19 syndrome, especially in detecting GGOs. LUS can be an effective complement to CT, reducing the need for frequent CT examinations and thus reducing the risk of radiation exposure. However, LUS may not be able to completely replace CT in some cases, especially when a detailed assessment of deep lung tissue lesions is required.