Incompatibility of gravity theories with auxiliary fields with the standard model

Giulia Ventagli,Paolo Pani,Thomas P. Sotiriou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.109.044002
IF: 5.407
2024-02-02
Physical Review D
Abstract:Theories of gravity with auxiliary fields are of particular interest since they are able to circumvent Lovelock's theorem while avoiding the introduction of new degrees of freedom. This type of theories introduces derivatives of the stress-energy tensor in the modified Einstein equation. This peculiar structure of the field equations was shown to lead to spacetime singularities on the surface of stars. Here we focus on yet another problem afflicting gravity theories with auxiliary fields. We show that such theories can generically introduce parametrically large deviations to the Standard Model unless one severely constrains the parameters of the theory, preventing them to produce significant phenomenology at large scales. We first consider the specific case of Palatini f(R) gravity, to clarify the results previously obtained in Ref. [1]. We show that the matter fields satisfy the Standard Model field equations which reduce to those predicted by general relativity in the local frame only at tree level, whereas at higher orders in perturbation theory they are affected by corrections that percolate from the gravity sector regardless of the specific f(R) model considered. Finally, we show that this is a more general issue affecting theories with auxiliary fields connected to the same terms responsible for the appearance of surface singularities. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.044002 Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Published by the American Physical Society
astronomy & astrophysics,physics, particles & fields
What problem does this paper attempt to address?