Abstract:Surgery for spinal disorders represents some of the commonest surgical procedures performed in many countries worldwide, carried out by neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. Residency training is shifting to competency-based medical education, which requires setting standards for graduating residents and their assessments. However, gaps exist in the literature regarding the parameters used for assessment and the mastery levels expected of graduating residents in the performance of common spinal procedures as defined in Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs). The objectives of the study were to describe the assessment parameters used for residents, identify the standard of performance expected of graduating residents of EPAs of spinal procedures, and identify factors predicting the expected standard of competent performance of graduating residents. The survey was sent to neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery Faculty requesting their recommendations on parameters of assessment and the expected standard competence performance for EPAs related to spinal procedures using our entrustment scale (A-E). Based on total responses, the recommended number of assessments and assessors for each EPA was 5 and 2, respectively. Regarding each specialty, there was no significant difference in the recommended number of assessments for each EPA. However, neurosurgery Faculty recommended higher number of assessors(n = 3) than orthopedic surgery Faculty(n = 2) for both posterior spinal decompression EPA(PSD) (p = 0.01) and spinal instrumentation EPA(SI) (p = 0.04). Based on total responses, 83% felt PSD was appropriate to the general practice, 86.8% considered it not too broad, and 62.3% expected entrustment level E as a graduation target. The proportions of these ratings were slightly lower for SI at 58.5%, 71.7% and 56.6%, respectively. Both specialties indicated that the EPAs were not too broad. In contrast, neurosurgery Faculty were more likely to consider these EPAs appropriate for general practice than orthopedic surgery Faculty for both PSD (94.7% vs 53.3%, p = 0.0003) and SI (68.4% vs 33.3%, p = 0.02). Moreover, neurosurgery Faculty had a higher expected standard of performance as a graduation target for both PSD (Level E 76.3% vs 26.7%, p = 0.001) and SI (Level E 65.8% vs 33.3%, p = 0.03) than orthopedic surgery Faculty. Expectations of entrustment level E for PSD was associated with the belief that the current EPA was appropriate for the general practice of their specialty with an odds ratio of 8.35 (p = 0.01, 95%CI 1.53–45.67). A difference exists in parameters of assessment and expected standard competence performance of spine procedures among spinal surgery specialties. In our opinion, there should be efforts to develop consensus between specialties for the sake of uniform delivery of high-quality care for patients regardless of the specialty of their surgeon. Our results will be particularly valuable to certification bodies in the assessment of spinal milestones. This study has important implications for the design of residency and fellowship education in spinal surgery internationally.

Utility of Spine Surgery Fellowship Training for Orthopaedic Surgeons in the United States

Factors Related to Clinical Performance in Spine Surgery Fellowship: Can We Predict Success

The Impact of Neuroanesthesia Fellowship Training and Anesthesiologist-Surgeon Dyad Volume on Patient Outcomes in Adult Spine Surgery: A Population-Based Study

Sex diversity in spine surgery fellowship training: analysis of recent trends and program characteristics associated with increased diversity

Increasing Value in Subspecialty Training: A Comparison of Variation in Surgical Complications for Pediatric Versus Other Fellowship-trained American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Candidates in the Treatment of Supracondylar Fractures

Innovative growth and development of a neurological surgery residency cadaveric spine-simulation training program: a single-institution experience

Surgeon training and clinical implementation of spinal endoscopy in routine practice: results of a global survey

Do Fellowship-educated Military Orthopaedic Oncologists Who Practice in Military Settings Treat a Sufficient Volume of Patients to Maintain Their Oncologic Expertise?

Advances and Challenges of Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Advanced laparoscopic fellowship and general surgery residency can coexist without detracting from surgical resident operative experience

Future Advances in Spine Surgery: The AOSpine North America Perspective

Surgical Specialty Outcome Differences for Major Spinal Procedures in Low-Acuity Patients

Predicting Academic Productivity Among American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Fellowship Faculty from Publications Acquired Before and During Surgical Training

Analysis of Recent Sleep Surgery Fellowship Training

The application of team-based learning for spine surgery in orthopedic residents and fellows

Current trends and perspectives of scoliosis research society travel fellows

Orthopedic Surgery Fellowship Directors: Trends in Demographics, Education, Employment, and Institutional Familiarity

Trends in Orthopaedic Surgery Fellowship Match Among Female Residents: Discrepancies in Sex Diversity by Subspecialty

Educating residents in spine surgery: A study of Entrustable professional activities in neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery

Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery: Role in Training the Next Generation of Spine Surgeons

What if You Could Treat the Same Patient Again, Would You do the Exact Same Spine Surgery? A Multi-Surgeon Survey of Their Own Revisions