Abstract:It is well‐known that the implementation of evidence into clinical practice is complex and challenging. The integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i‐PARIHS) framework conceptualizes successful implementation of evidence into practice. As the implementation of the mentoring programme proved to be a challenge, it seemed valuable to retrospectively study the implementation process using a framework like the i‐PARIHS. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate implementation of a multifaceted mentoring programme for bedside nurses using the i‐PARIHS framework, to identify factors that influenced the implementation. Design A secondary analysis of qualitative data using the i‐PARIHS framework as the theoretical lens. Method A directed content analysis was performed, driven theoretically by the i‐PARIHS framework. The analysis focused separately on (a) characteristics of the innovation and (b) successful and hindering factors in the implementation process. Results The results showed that successful factors influencing implementation of the mentoring programme included supportive and actively involved formal leaders and supervisors at the unit level. A major hindering factor was lack of resources in the form of personnel, time and money. A lack of facilitators, particularly experienced facilitators, throughout the organization hindered implementation. The i‐PARIHS framework offered a structured how‐to guide to identify factors that influenced the implementation process. Conclusion Implementation of the mentoring programme was a challenge for the organization. Investment into implementation should continue, with a more structured facilitation process. A structured and prioritized management system, including supportive leadership at the unit level, should be established by the hospital board. Implications for the profession There is a need for experienced facilitators throughout the organization. This is crucial to achieve sustainability in the mentoring programme and ensure that the large investments of staff resources and money do not fizzle out. Impact What problem did the study address? Implementing a mentoring programme for nurses in a large university hospital proved to be a challenge. Therefore, it seemed valuable to retrospectively study the implementation process using a framework like the i‐PARIHS. What were the main findings? A lack of facilitators, particularly experienced facilitators, throughout the organization hindered the implementation. The i‐PARIHS framework offered a structured how‐to guide to identify factors that influenced the implementation process. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Our findings are important for leaders on all levels in a hospital setting, including the hospital board, heads of departments and nurse managers. Reporting Method Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32‐item checklist for interviews and focus groups is used. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution.

Post Hoc Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Analysis of Older Person/Student Nurse Intergenerational Café Implementation

Facilitating intergenerational learning between older people and student nurses: An integrative review

Promoting meaningful engagement for residents living with dementia through intergenerational programs: a pilot study

Bridging the intergenerational gap: the outcomes of a student-initiated, longitudinal, inter-professional, inter-generational home visit program

Implementing an interdisciplinary intergenerational program using the Cyber Seniors® reverse mentoring model within higher education

Utilising a Co-Design Approach to Strategically Plan Dementia Education for Diverse Populations in Ireland

An intergenerational playgroup in an Australian residential aged-care setting: A qualitative case study

Older people's perceptions of intergenerational relationships in nursing homes: A qualitative content analysis

Student nurse–older person communication

A 10-week intergenerational program bringing together community-living older adults and preschool children (INTERACTION): a pilot feasibility non-randomised clinical trial

Student experiences with an interprofessional hope-based healthy aging research project

Is this to be another project that fizzles out? Using the i‐PARIHS framework to evaluate implementation of a mentoring programme

A pilot study of an intergenerational program for people in residential aged care with cognitive impairment and children from a co-located early learning centre during COVID-19

Intergenerational learning as a pedagogical strategy in early childhood education services: perspectives from an Irish study

FC57: Implementation and feasibility testing of a co-designed palliative dementia intervention: Empowering Better End of life Dementia Care Framework (EMBED-Care Framework)

Dietetics student contribution to addressing malnutrition in residential aged care facilities

P45: Feasibility evaluation an eHealth intervention to support holistic assessment and decision making for people with dementia in care homes

The utility and feasibility of incorporating death cafes in undergraduate education: A qualitative exploration of medical and nursing students' perspectives

Acceptability of a nurse-led, person-centred, anticipatory care planning intervention for older people at risk of functional decline: A qualitative study

A realist process evaluation of an intervention to promote competencies in interprofessional collaboration among interdisciplinary integrated care teams for older people: Study protocol.

Nursing students' experiences of, and socialisation in, dementia care in the acute hospital setting