State-based assessment of cyclic liquefaction manifestation

Jorge Macedo,Luis Vergaray

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108520

IF: 4

2024-02-18

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Abstract:This study assesses the robustness of a framework based on critical state soil mechanics (CSSM) principles in evaluating earthquake-induced liquefaction manifestation. The assessment is motivated by the contrasting procedures in evaluating static and cyclic liquefaction, where mechanical properties commonly inform the former, whereas the latter often relies on semiempirical-based methods. The framework discussed in this study considers as ingredients (1) laboratory-based mechanical properties that are an average representation of soil's microstructure, (2) state inversion, (3) the link of state with cyclic resistance ratio ( CRR ), and (4) the seismic demand, represented by the cyclic stress ratio ( CSR ). The framework is assessed using ∼5000 cone penetration tests (CPTus) conducted after the Canterbury earthquake sequence, where each CPTu is associated with liquefaction manifestation levels. The discussed framework is used to estimate safety factors, which are then combined with several liquefaction severity indexes (LSIs) to evaluate liquefaction manifestation in the context of a classification problem (i.e., "Yes" and "No"). The framework's performance is assessed using machine learning by estimating receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). Different state inversion procedures are also considered, and recommendations based on their performance are provided. In particular, a calibrated cavity expansion-based inversion for New Zealand is proposed. We find that the discussed framework offers comparable performance to state-of-practice procedures, even when general considerations for mechanical properties based on CSSM are made, which is encouraging. Moreover, by including mechanical properties, it can better inform extrapolations for regions without significant data and non-typical soils as long as adequate properties are considered. In this context, it shares conceptual similarities with non-ergodic approaches in earthquake engineering.

geosciences, multidisciplinary,engineering, geological