What is the best option for surgical face mask wastes treatment? Integrated LCA and MCDM methodologies

A. Özdemir,A. Özkan,Z. Günkaya,M. Banar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05486-y
2024-03-14
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
Abstract:Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, face masks have been indispensable in the daily lives of people to reduce the risk of infection and spread of the virus. Polypropylene fabric, which is main part of the disposable surgical face mask (SFM), is waste that can remain in the environment for years because of its non-biodegradable structure, so this waste needs to be carefully managed. In the present study, the Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCA) integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach was applied to prioritize SFM waste treatment/disposal strategies; incineration, pyrolysis, direct landfilling, and steam sterilization-landfilling. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS) were used for ranking as MCDM techniques. Thirteen different criteria were determined, and the criteria related to environmental impact were obtained from the LCA output. The weights of the significance of all criteria were computed using the Entropy weighting method. The ranking results show that pyrolysis is found as a being more appropriate alternative (with values of 0.4397 and 0.8140 for AHP and TOPSIS, respectively). In addition, the second ranking alternative is incineration, followed by the direct landfilling alternative which is assessed as the third preferable treatment/disposal option. The steam sterilization-landfilling option is found to be the least appropriate solution. These results reveal that the pyrolysis option might be considered as well, as it changes this waste into value-added energy products, thereby helping achieve a sustainable method for environmental benefit and advantage.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?