0476 SPLIT-Polysomnography Parameters and Auto-CPAP Adherence Factors in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic-White Patients

itzel Vazquez Vazquez,Moon Park,Raffaele Ferri,Lourdes DelRosso
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0476
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Studies on Hispanic patients (HP) in the US have highlighted a higher prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) compared to non-Hispanic White patients (WP). However, the role of obesity or body mass index (BMI) as a confounding factor remains unclear. Few studies have investigated the success of titration in split-night polysomnography (PSG) and factors affecting continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence. This study aims to assess OSA severity and PSG parameters in HP vs. WP, differences in treatment during split-night PSG studies, and CPAP adherence factors during follow-up. Methods We conducted a retrospective clinical chart review, split-night PSG studies, and CPAP adherence on adults at the University of California, San Francisco, in Fresno, from 3/1/2023 to 9/11/2023. Participants were categorized based on self-reported ethnicity as HP or WP. Results The study included 50 WP (15 women, 35 men, mean age 60.5±13.60 years, mean BMI 34.2±7.48) and 45 HP (24 women, 21 men, mean age 54.9±13.06 years, mean BMI 37.3±7.88). The mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in HP was 51.1±33.67, saturation nadir 77.8±10.19, and time spent with saturation < 88% was 16.9±23.50 minutes. In WP, the mean AHI was 39.2±24.49, saturation nadir 81.6±9.04, and time spent < 88% was 7±11.36 minutes. All differences were statistically significant (p< 0.05). Titration data did not vary between groups. Auto CPAP was prescribed to all patients, with adherence at 3-4 months in HP at 75%±30, usage of 5.5±2.2 hours, and residual AHI 3±3.5. In WP, adherence was 79%±30, usage 5.9±2.1 hours, and residual AHI 3.6±6.2. None of these differences were statistically significant. Among HP, 37% missed follow-up appointments compared to 12% of WP. More HP used full-face masks, while more WP used nasal masks. Conclusion HP exhibited significantly worse OSA parameters during the diagnostic portion of PSG than WP. However, both groups demonstrated similar treatment outcomes in the split study. HP had a significantly higher no-show percentage than WP. CPAP adherence and residual AHI were not statistically different among those with follow-up, but more HP missed follow-up appointments than WP. Mask preferences differed between groups, with HP favoring full-face masks and WP preferring nasal masks. Support (if any)
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?