Abstract:Background Intravenous (IV) medication administration has traditionally been regarded to be error-prone with high potential for harm. A recent US multisite study revealed surprisingly few potentially harmful errors despite a high overall error rate. However, there is limited evidence about infusion practices in England and how they relate to prevalence and types of error. Objectives To determine the prevalence, types and severity of errors and discrepancies in infusion administration in English hospitals, and to explore sources of variation in errors, discrepancies and practices, including the contribution of smart pumps. Design Phase 1 comprised an observational point-prevalence study of IV infusions, with debrief interviews and focus groups. Observers compared each infusion against the medication order and local policy. Deviations were classified as either errors or discrepancies based on their potential for patient harm. Contextual issues and reasons for deviations were explored qualitatively during observer debriefs, and analytically in supplementary analyses. Phase 2 comprised in-depth observational studies at five of the participating sites to better understand causes of error and how safety is maintained. Workshops were held with key stakeholder groups, including health professionals and policy-makers, the public and industry. Setting Sixteen English NHS hospital trusts. Results Point-prevalence data were collected from 1326 patients and 2008 infusions. In total, 240 errors were observed in 231 infusions and 1489 discrepancies were observed in 1065 infusions. Twenty-three errors (1.1% of all infusions) were considered potentially harmful; one might have resulted in short-term patient harm had it not been intercepted, but none was judged likely to prolong hospital stay or result in long-term harm. Types and prevalence of deviations varied widely among trusts, as did local policies. Deviations from medication orders and local policies were sometimes made for efficiency or to respond to patient need. Smart pumps, as currently implemented, had little effect. Staff had developed practices to manage efficiency and safety pragmatically by working around systemic challenges. Limitations Local observers may have assessed errors differently across sites, although steps were taken to minimise differences through observer training, debriefs, and review and cleaning of data. Each in-depth study involved a single researcher, and these were limited in scale and scope. Conclusions Errors and discrepancies are common in everyday infusion administration but most have low potential for patient harm. Findings are best understood by viewing IV infusion administration as a complex adaptive system. Better understanding of performance variability to strategically manage risk may be more helpful for improving patient safety than striving to eliminate all deviations. Future work There is potential value in reviewing policy around IV infusion administration to reduce unnecessary variability, manage staff workload and engage patients, while retaining the principle that policy has to be fit for purpose, contextualised to the particular ward situation and treatment protocol, and sensitive to the risks of different medications. Further work on understanding infusion administration as a complex adaptive system might deliver new insights into managing patient safety. Funding This project was funded by the NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research ; Vol. 8, No. 7. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Simulated haemodynamic parameters and different infusion set-up affect drug delivery during syringe pump change over: A bench-top study in a laboratory setting

Effect of central venous pressure on fluid delivery during start-up of syringe infusion pumps for microinfusion

Pump-driven clinical infusions: laboratory comparison of pump types, fluid composition and flow rates on model drug delivery applying a new quantitative tool, the pharmacokinetic coefficient of short-term variation (PK-CV)

Intravenous Smart Pumps During Actual Clinical Use: A Descriptive Comparison of Primary and Secondary Infusion Practices

Critical parameters in drug delivery by intravenous infusion

Primary Intravenous Set Consumption Across 3 Branded Infusion Pumps

Efficacy of Rapid Fluid Administration Using Various Setups and Devices

Effect of non-return valves on the time-of-arrival of new medication in a patient after syringe exchange in an infusion set-up

A Novel Subcutaneous Infusion Delivery System Based on Osmotic Pump:In Vitroandin Vivoevaluation

Determinants of Intravenous Infusion Longevity and Infusion Failure via a Nonlinear Model Analysis of Smart Pump Event Logs: Retrospective Study

Comparison of extravasation events related to the peripheral administration of vasopressors prior to and following implementation of an institutional protocol

Simultaneous Venous-Arterial Doppler Ultrasound During Early Fluid Resuscitation to Characterize a Novel Doppler Starling Curve: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study

Intravenous infusion practices across England and their impact on patient safety: a mixed-methods observational study

Susceptibility of two different PCA pumps to inaccurate delivery associated with pole position at low flow-rates in a pediatric setting – an experimental study

Accuracy of Bolus and Basal Rate Delivery of Different Insulin Pump Systems

Uncontrolled delivery of liquid volatile anaesthetic when using the anaesthetic conserving device

A comparative analysis of intravenous infusion methods for low-resource environments

The influence of needleless connectors and inserted catheters on flow rates through vascular introducer sheaths

Direct Observational Study of Interfaced Smart-Pumps in Pediatric Intensive Care

Flow Rate Deviation in Infusion Pump: Infusion Set Defect Enables Pump Malfunction and Considerable Accuracy Deviation

Safety and efficacy of peripheral versus centrally administered vasopressor infusion: A single-centre retrospective observational study