Abstract:Introduction: Health disparities in the Military Health System (MHS) have been consistently documented despite the system ensuring equal access to care for its beneficiaries. Research has shown that social, economic, and political factors (i.e., Social Determinants of Health) and health care-specific factors like provider bias and systemic discrimination are key drivers of health disparities in the general population. Medical education focused on introducing these concepts using case-based learning has led to effective learning of health equity terminology. However, a significant gap exists in identifying optimal teaching approaches to develop skills to recognize these factors in actual clinical cases. This begs the million-dollar question: can case-based learning help trainees acquire the skills needed to identify the main factors contributing to health disparities in the MHS? Materials and methods: A longitudinal case-based curriculum was developed in which clinical cases from the Internal Medicine Wards, Medical Intensive Care Unit, or General Internal Medicine Clinic at the National Capital Consortium were solicited from trainees and analyzed for evidence of health care provider bias and systemic forms of discrimination using small groups. The National Capital Consortium Internal Medicine Residency Program implemented this pilot study in November 2021. A retrospective pretest-posttest survey assessing trainee reactions to the curriculum and changes in self-reported confidence in skills was used for curriculum assessment. Survey data were analyzed using a paired samples t-test. Results: The survey was administered during the last session of the 2022-2023 academic year, with 14 of the 23 available trainees completing it: a 60.8% response rate. Overall, 93% reported that the cases selected that academic year were engaging; the skills they were taught were practice-changing, and the educational value of the curriculum was good, very good, or excellent. Confidence ratings, assessed via a 5-point Likert Scale, demonstrated a statistically significant increase in self-reported confidence in the following skill domains with large effect sizes: identification of bias and systemic discrimination in clinical cases-change in mean: 1.07 (Pre: 3.29, Post: 4.36), P < .001, g = 1.38; recognizing and mitigating personal biases-change in mean: 0.71 (Pre: 3.50, Post: 4.21), P <.001, g = 1.10; participating in a discussion about health care provider bias and systemic discrimination-change in mean: 0.79 (Pre: 3.57, Post: 4.36), P = .001, g = 1.06; and leading a discussion about bias and systemic discrimination-change in mean: 1.00 (Pre: 2.93, Post: 3.93), P = .002, g = 0.98. Conclusions: As the need to address health disparities in the United States becomes more pressing, so does the need for military physicians to recognize the drivers of these disparities within the MHS. Results from this pilot study of Health Equity Rounds suggest that case-based learning may be an optimal teaching approach to improve the skills of military Internal Medicine trainees in identifying and recognizing the impact of health care provider bias and systemic discrimination on clinical cases from the MHS.

Advancing Equity in Assessment in the Surgical Learning Environment

Strategies for Advancing Equity in Frontline Clinical Assessment

Race-Conscious Learning and Sociocultural Competence in an Academic Surgery Program: Diversity, Equity, and All-Inclusion Program

Developing Evidence for Equitable Assessment Characteristics Based on Clinical Learner Preferences Using Discrete Choice Experiments

Embracing Our Differences: Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Through Perioperative Nursing Education

Differential attainment in assessment of postgraduate surgical trainees: a scoping review

Leveraging the health equity implementation framework to foster an equity focus in medical education

Opportunities and Applications of Educational Technologies in Surgical Education and Assessment

Integrating equity frameworks into surgical quality improvement and health administrative databases: A narrative review

A needs assessment for simulation in African surgical education

A Critical Look at Racism in the Clinical Learning Environment and the Erasure of DEI Efforts

Clarifying and expanding equity in assessment by considering three orientations: Fairness, inclusion and justice

Advancing health equity in prelicensure nursing curricula: Findings from a critical review

Taking action to achieve health equity and eliminate healthcare disparities within acute care surgery

Recommendations to address and research systemic bias in assessment: perspectives from directors of research in medical education

A clinical antiracism curriculum for third-year medical students to bring antiracist principles to the bedside

A Curricular Audit Method: Addressing the Erasure of Intersex, Trans and Two-Spirit People and the Imprecise Use of Gender and Sex Concepts in Undergraduate Medical Education

Shifting paradigms: A collective and structural strategy for addressing healthcare inequity

Unintended consequences - Risk for bias in competency-based assessment

Application of an Antiracism Framework to Improve Pediatric APRN Education

Implementation of a "Health Equity Rounds" Curriculum in a Military Internal Medicine Residency Program: A Pilot Study