Chemomodulatory effect of neferine on DMBA‐induced squamous cell carcinogenesis: Biochemical and molecular approach

Jingxuan Wang,Yan Hu,Jieying Yuan,Yan Zhang,Yifan Wang,Yingshun Yang,Tahani Awad Alahmadi,Sulaiman Ali Alharbi,Zhizheng Zhuang,Fan Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.23051
IF: 4.109
2020-11-06
Environmental Toxicology
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Neferine (NEF) is nontoxic, bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloid is derived from the seed embryo of lotus, a familiar medicinal plant. Although several mechanisms have been planned, an evident antitumor action pathway of NEF on the oral tumor is still not known. In the current study, we aimed at investigating the protecting effect of NEF against experimental oral carcinoma and clarify its possible mechanism through the induction of apoptosis, proliferation, and inflammatory signaling pathways.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>The experimental hamsters were divided into four groups (I‐IV) containing six hamsters each. The group I was control group, group II and III hamsters treated with 7,12‐dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) (0.5%) alone, thrice in a week for 10 weeks, and group III and IV hamsters received oral supplementation of NEF at a concentration of 15 mg/kg bw. All the hamsters were sacrificed after 16 weeks.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Our results revealed that DMBA treated hamsters exhibited 100% oral tumor cell formation with high‐tumor incidence (TI), tumor number (TN), tumor volume (TV), decreased levels of antioxidants, increased status of lipid peroxidation (LPO), and modulated the activities of liver marker agents as well as NF‐kB, cell proliferation (PCNA), and p53 proteins. NEF supplementation in DMBA treated hamsters, resulted in delayed lesion synthesis, and brought back the levels of the biochemical parameters. In addition, immunostaining of NF‐kB, PCNA, and p53 showed that they were inhibited by NEF.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>Thus, NEF might be considered a better chemopreventive drug in an experimental model of home‐based primary care (HBPC). More research is necessary to study other pathways implicated in oral carcinomas and their modulation by NEF.</p></section>
toxicology,environmental sciences,water resources
What problem does this paper attempt to address?