Abstract:Background: Isolated abdominal aortic dissection (IAAD) is a rare entity with poorly defined risk factors and wide variation in management. We set forth to compare patient characteristics, management, and outcomes of uncomplicated isolated abdominal aortic dissection (uIAAD) versus high risk and complicated isolated abdominal aortic dissection (hrcIAAD) to investigate whether these categories can be utilized to guide IAAD management and provide risk stratification for intervention. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients with spontaneous IAAD at a tertiary health care system between 1996 and 2022. Demographics, comorbidities, factors relating to initial presentation including imaging findings, and dissection outcomes including long-term all-cause mortality and aortic-related mortality from time of dissection to final available record were abstracted. IAAD demonstrating rupture or malperfusion were designated as complicated, those with aortic diameter greater than 4 cm on presentation or refractory pain were designated as high risk, and the remainder was designated as uIAAD. All variables were compared between hrcIAAD and uIAAD using Fisher's exact test, unpaired t-test, and Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate. Results: Over the study period, 74 patients presented with spontaneous IAAD (mean age 60 ± 16 years, 61% male) with postdissection follow-up records to an average of 6.8 ± 5.8 years. Of these, 76% presented with uIAAD versus 24% with hrcIAAD. hrcIAAD was diagnosed at a significantly younger age on average than uIAAD (52 ± 14 vs. 62 ± 16 years, P = 0.02), was less likely to present with concomitant hyperlipidemia (0% vs. 41%, P < 0.01), coronary artery disease (6% vs. 47%, P < 0.01), and prior smoking history (39% vs. 72%). hrcIAAD was more likely to present in patients with a genetic aortopathy (27% vs. 7%, P = 0.03). Hypertension was not significantly different between groups. Patients with hrcIAAD were significantly more likely to present with extension into iliac arteries compared to uIAAD (61% vs. 18%, P < 0.01). A much higher proportion of hrcIAAD required hospitalization compared to uIAAD (83% vs. 30%, P < 0.01) and operative intervention (67% vs. 7%, P < 0.01). While there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between groups, there was a significant difference between aortic-related mortality which only occurred in those with hrcIAAD (28% vs. 0%, P < 0.01). Conclusions: Comparison of long-term outcomes suggests that hrcIAAD is associated with increased hospitalization and need for operative intervention compared to uIAAD. Significant differences in atherosclerotic risk factors and proportions of connective tissue disease history between patients who present with hrcIAAD and uIAAD suggest that differences in underlying etiology are largely responsible for whether IAAD progresses towards rupture or has a more benign course and should be considered in risk stratification to guide more specific and targeted management of IAAD.

Radiographic complicated and uncomplicated descending aortic dissections: aortic morphological differences by CT angiography and risk factor analysis

Non-A Non-B Acute Aortic Dissection: Is There Some Confusion in the Radiologist’s Mind?

Early aortic growth in acute descending aortic dissection

Aortic Arch Morphology and Aortic Dissection in Computed Tomography Angiography

Aortic Geometric Alteration Associated With Acute Type B Aortic Dissection: Angulation, Tortuosity, and Arch Type

The correlation study between the length and angle of ascending aortic and the incidence risk of acute type A aortic dissection

Anatomic data and clinical significance analysis of 150 cases of type A aortic dissection

Morphological risk of acute type A aortic dissection in the mildly to moderately dilated aorta

Alterations of Arterial Morphology in Patients with Aberrant Subclavian Artery and Type B Dissection and Its Association with Dissection.

Association Between Preoperative D-dimer with Morphologic Features and Surgical Outcomes of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Complicated and Uncomplicated Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissections Demonstrate Different Patient Characteristics and Outcomes

Relationship Between Length and Curvature of Ascending Aorta and Type a Dissection.

Morphology of the Ascending Aorta: a Study on 114 Chinese Patients

Ascending Geometry After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Descending Aortic Dissection

Aortic dissection reconsidered: type, entry site, malperfusion classification adding clarity and enabling outcome prediction

The incidence of delayed complications in acute type B aortic dissections is underestimated

Morphological Features of Aortic Arch Predicting the Risk for Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

Identification of High-Risk Patients for Development of Type B Aortic Dissection Based on Novel Morphological Parameters.

The Role of Spatial Aortic Arch Architecture in Type B Aortic Dissection

Predicting the risk for acute type B aortic dissection in hypertensive patients using anatomic variables

Radiomics-Based Risk Assessment Correlates With Outcomes in Patients With Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Repair