Abstract:Abstract For years, dissociation studies on neurological single cases with brain lesions were the dominant method to infer fundamental cognitive functions in neuropsychology. In contrast, the association between deficits was considered to be of less epistemological value and even misleading. Still, principal component analysis (PCA) – an associational method for dimensionality reduction – recently became popular for the identification of fundamental functions. The current study evaluated the ability of PCA and factor analysis (FA) to overcome the association problem in behavioural data of neurological patients and to identify the fundamental variables underlying a battery of measures. Synthetic data were simulated to resemble neuropsychological data with typical dissociation patterns and, thereby, typical patterns of dependence between variables. In most experiments, PCA and FA succeeded to measure the underlying target variables with high up to almost perfect precision. However, this success was fragile and relied on the success of factor rotation, which failed its intended purpose when no test scores existed that primarily measured each underlying target variable. Further, commonly used strategies to estimate the number of meaningful factors appear to underfactor neuropsychological data, thereby consistently underestimating the dimensionality of the data. Finally, simulations suggested a high potential of PCA to denoise data, with factor rotation providing an additional filter function. This can be invaluable in neuropsychology, where measures are often inherently noisy, and PCA can be superior to common compound measures, such as the arithmetic mean, in the measurement of variables with high reliability. In summary, PCA and FA appear to be powerful tools in neuropsychology that are well capable to infer fundamental cognitive functions with high precision, but the typical structure of neuropsychological data and limited informative value of associations in neuropsychology place clear limitations and a risk of a complete failure on the methods.

On Optimal Allocation of Treatment/Condition Variance in Principal Component Analysis

Robust Principal Component Analysis Based on Maximum Correntropy Criterion

Principal Components Analysis in Clinical Studies

Structured Principal Component Analysis Model With Variable Correlation Constraint

PCA Rerandomization.

Optimal Projected Variance Group-Sparse Block PCA

Optimal designs for multiple treatments with unequal variances

Optimal rank-based testing for principal components

A note on the variance in principal component regression

Penalized Optimal Scaling for Ordinal Variables with an Application to International Classification of Functioning Core Sets

A Simulation Study of the Effects of Additive, Multiplicative, Correlated, and Uncorrelated Errors on Principal Component Analysis

Generative Principal Component Regression via Variational Inference

Can we Restore Balance to Geometric Morphometrics? A Theoretical Evaluation of how Sample Imbalance Conditions Ordination and Classification

From explained variance of correlated components to PCA without orthogonality constraints

Multivariate Functional Principal Component Analysis for Data Observed on Different (Dimensional) Domains

Multilevel hybrid principal components analysis for region-referenced functional electroencephalography data

The use of principal component and factor analysis to measure fundamental cognitive processes in neuropsychological data

Fat Tailed Factors

Maximally Correlated Principal Component Analysis

Optimum designs for clinical trials in personalized medicine when response variance depends on treatment

Sparse and Functional Principal Components Analysis