The accuracy and reliability of different midsagittal planes in the symmetry assessment using cone‐beam computed tomography

Shaoyang Yu,Yao Zheng,Lirong Dong,Wenli Huang,Haoting Wu,Qiang Zhang,Xiao Yan,Wei Wu,Tao Lv,Xiao Yuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.24133
2024-01-10
Clinical Anatomy
Abstract:Symmetry is an essential component of esthetic assessment. Accurate assessment of facial symmetry is critical to the treatment plan of orthognathic surgery and orthodontic treatment. However, there is no internationally accepted midsagittal plane (MSP) for orthodontists and orthognathic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to explore a clinically friendly MSP, which is more accurate and reliable than what is commonly used in symmetry assessment. Forty patients with symmetric craniofacial structures were analyzed on cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. The CBCT data were exported to the Simplant Pro software to build four reference planes that were constructed by nasion (N), basion (Ba), sella (S), odontoid (Dent), or incisive foramen (IF). A total of 31 landmarks were located to determine which reference plane is the most optimal MSP by comparing the asymmetry index (AI). The mean value of AI showed a significant difference (p
anatomy & morphology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?