Platform-Enabled Informality?

Nicole Gurran,Zahra Nasreen,Pranita Shrestha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2024.2326554

2024-04-24

Journal of the American Planning Association

Abstract:Problem, research strategy, and findings Digital platforms have transformed housing practices and enabled new markets to emerge. Here we report on a study in which we examined these practices and their implications for planning, focusing particularly on low-cost and informal rental accommodation. With reference to Australia's three largest cities (Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane), we investigated the range and scale of accommodation types advertised on major commercial and peer-to-peer platforms Realestate.com.au, Flatmates.com.au, Gumtree.com.au, and Airbnb.com, identifying an informal housing typology comprising secondary dwelling units, share homes or rooms, and Airbnb-style holiday accommodation, much of which violates local regulation. We found that secondary dwellings and other irregular types of accommodation comprised more than 3% of Sydney's rental vacancies and more than 10% of enumerated rental vacancies in Brisbane during the study period of August 2021. Informal tenures such as rooms in share homes or negotiated arrangements offered by property owners extended rental supply in Sydney and Melbourne by the equivalent of more than 16% over the same period, rising to almost 34% in Brisbane. These findings show that platforms have enabled property owners to market illegal rentals and unauthorized dwellings but also have helped lower-income earners access lower-cost accommodations. Planners must determine which practices support affordability without generating unacceptable risks for residents and neighborhoods.

urban studies,regional & urban planning

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore how digital platforms have transformed housing practices and provides an in-depth study of the informal rental market in three major Australian cities (Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane). Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Research Background**: With the development of online platforms (such as Airbnb), their influence on the housing market has grown significantly. However, the impact of these platforms on local housing markets and communities has not been fully studied.

2. **Research Methods**: The authors collected and analyzed advertisement data from major commercial platforms (such as Realestate.com.au, Flatmates.com.au, Gumtree.com.au) and short-term rental platform Airbnb to construct a classification system for low-cost and informal housing types.

3. **Main Findings**:
- Digital platforms enable landlords to promote illegal or unauthorized rental properties, while also helping low-income individuals find affordable housing.
- During the study period (August 2021), informal rental types (including secondary dwelling units, shared houses, etc.) accounted for 3% to 10% of the total rental vacancy rate in Sydney and Brisbane.
- Shared houses or other informal agreements expanded the rental supply by more than 16% in Sydney and Melbourne, and up to 34% in Brisbane.
- Although rents are generally lower than the formal market, these housing options may not be sustainable for low-income families, as they often have to accept lower living security and privacy conditions.

4. **Policy Recommendations**: Planners must identify practices that can support affordable housing without posing unacceptable risks to residents and communities.

Overall, this study reveals how digital platforms have both facilitated the development of the informal rental market and introduced new challenges, particularly in ensuring the quality and safety of rental housing.