Abstract:collected for each patient before biopsy. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board at Huashan Hospital and written informed consent was completed for each patient. Because the Hologic PCA3 kit is not currently available in China, urine PCA3 RNA level was measured using an in-house qPCR method and its level was normalized by urine levels of PSA mRNA. PCA3 level was calculated using ∆Ct = CtPCA3 − CtPSA. 8 Twenty-nine PCa risk-associated SNPs discovered from GWAS and confirmed in the Chinese population (P < 0.05) were genotyped using MassARRAY iPLEX (Sequenom, Inc., CA, USA).9 A GRS was calculated for each subject based on their genotypes at these 29 SNPs and weighted by odd ratios of these SNPs derived from an external study.10 Association of PCa diagnosis with PCA3, GRS, and other clinical variables were tested using both univariate and multivariate analyses. Total PSA, PCA3, free to total PSA ratio, and GRS were log-transformed prior to statistical tests. The key demographic and clinical variables for the 99 patients in the cohort, as well as their association with PCa risk, are presented in Table 1. Based on univariate analysis, higher PCA3 (P = 0.0002), higher total PSA (P = 0.0002), higher GRS (P = 0.0008), lower free to total PSA ratio (P = 0.007), and smaller prostate volume (P = 0.0003) were each associated with increased risk for PCa. The performance for discriminating PCa from non-PCa, measured by area under the curve (AUC), was 0.73 for total PSA, 0.77 for PCA3, and 0.70 for GRS. We also examined in detail the added value of PCA3 and GRS to total PSA in discriminating prostate biopsy outcomes (Table 2). Compared to Model 1 with total PSA alone where AUC was 0.73, the AUC increased to 0.81 for Model 2 with total PSA and GRS (P = 0.05), and to 0.84 for Model 3 with total PSA and PCA3 (P = 0.01). The AUC for Model 4 with all three variables (total PSA, GRS and PCA3) was further increased to 0.86, although the improvement was not statistically significant over Model 2 (P = 0.08) or Model 3 (P = 0.34). When all six variables were considered together in a multivariate analysis, only three variables were independently associated with PCa risk from a multivariate analysis; total PSA (P = 0.001), prostate volume (P = 0.0001), and PCA3 (P = 0.027). The AUC of the best multivariate model for discriminating PCa from non-PCa was excellent at 0.94. Dear Editor, We report here the performance of prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) and genetic risk score (GRS) in predicting prostate cancer (PCa) from the prostate biopsy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of simultaneously evaluating these two biomarkers in the same study. The incidence of PCa has increased in China over the last two decades, likely due to a combination of factors such as increase in life expectancy, better detection method of PCa, and life style changes.1 PCa is typically diagnosed from the prostate biopsy in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels. However, for moderately elevated PSA levels, its specificity for PCa is relatively low because other prostate disorders may also lead to elevated PSA levels.2 Therefore, additional biomarkers are needed to complement PSA to better identify patients that may benefit from prostate biopsy. Two recently proposed biomarkers of PCa are promising. The first is a urine biomarker (PCA3), a noncoding RNA that was first reported in 1991 to have higher expression in prostate tumors than normal or benign prostate tissue.3 Since then several studies found that it can also be detected in the urine after digital rectal exam (DRE).4,5 A urine PCA3 test for considering a repeat biopsy in men 50 years of age or older who have had one or more previous negative prostate biopsies by Hologic Gen-Probe was approved by the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2012. The second is GRS derived from multiple PCa risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified from genome-wide association studies (GWAS).6,7 Although each of these two biomarkers has been evaluated individually, the combined effect of these two biomarkers in predicting PCa from the prostate biopsy have not been reported. We assessed the joint effect of these two biomarkers in a biopsy cohort of the Chinese population. Subjects in this study were patients scheduled for needle prostate biopsy at Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China during 2012 and 2013. Blood samples and post-DRE urine were LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Validation of candidate protein biomarkers previously identified by genetic instruments for prostate cancer risk: A prospective cohort analysis of directly measured protein levels in the ARIC study

Identification of novel biomarkers differentially expressed between African-American and Caucasian-American prostate cancer patients

Identification of blood protein biomarkers associated with prostate cancer risk using genetic prediction models: analysis of over 140 000 subjects

Abstract 6084: Identification of plasma proteins for early detection of cancer, including lung, in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

Development and External Multicenter Validation of Chinese Prostate Cancer Consortium Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy.

Abstract P202: Proteomic Markers Associated With the Risk of Incident Hypertension in the Community: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

Abstract A039: Joint roles of proteomics and neighborhood-level social determinants of metastatic prostate cancer

Abstract LB158: Total, LDL-, HDL-cholesterol, apolipoproteins, and triglycerides and risk fatal prostate cancer in black and white men in the ARIC study

Abstract 7330: Identifying proteomic risk factors for overall, aggressive and early onset prostate cancer using mendelian randomization and tumor spatial transcriptomics

Identifying proteomic risk factors for overall, aggressive and early onset prostate cancer using Mendelian randomization and tumor spatial transcriptomics

Circulating Proteins and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: a Case-Subcohort Study among Chinese Adults.

Identifying proteomic risk factors for overall, aggressive, and early onset prostate cancer using Mendelian Randomisation and tumour spatial transcriptomics

Proteogenomic Analysis Identifies a Causal Association Between Plasma Apolipoprotein B Levels and Liver Cancer Risk.

Evaluation of circulating plasma proteins in prostate cancer using mendelian randomization

Abstract P199: Proteomic Markers of Aortic Stenosis: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

Abstract P194: Proteomic Profiling of Pulmonary Function Decline and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

A Machine Learning Method for Predicting Biomarkers Associated with Prostate Cancer

Total‐, LDL‐, and HDL‐cholesterol, apolipoproteins, and triglycerides with risk of total and fatal prostate cancer in Black and White men in the ARIC study

Enhanced prediction of atrial fibrillation risk using proteomic markers: a comparative analysis with clinical and polygenic risk scores

Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 and Genetic Risk Score As Markers for the Detection of Prostate Cancer in the Chinese Population.

Identifying proteomic risk factors for cancer using prospective and exome analyses: 1,463 circulating proteins and risk of 19 cancers in the UK Biobank