Physical and structural characterization of bis-acryl composite resin

Wendy E. Rodríguez-Guardado,Eric M. Rivera-Muñoz,Janeth Serrano-Bello,Marco A. Alvarez-Perez,Rubén A. Domínguez-Pérez,Elias Nahum Salmerón-Valdés,Febe C. Vázquez Vázquez,Osmar A. Chanes-Cuevas,Beatriz Millán-Malo,Carmen L. Peza-Ledesma,Rodrigo Correa-Prado
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58649-9
IF: 4.6
2024-04-08
Scientific Reports
Abstract:During the preparation of fixed prosthesis (including individual bridges and crowns) it is important to select the materials that have the best features and properties to predict a successful clinical treatment. The objective of this study was to determine if the chemical and structural characteristics could cause to increase the fracture resistance, we used four bis-acryl resins Luxatemp, Protemp, Structur and Telio. Three-points bending by Flexural test were performed in ten bars and they were carried out to compare with Anova test. In addition, the bis-acryl resins were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, to analyze microstructure and morphology and the molecular structure were performed by Infrared Spectroscopy through Attenuated Total Reflectance. A higher flexural strength was found in Luxatemp and Structur with, no significant differences between this study groups. Regarding Protemp and Telio, these study groups showed a lower flexural strength when were compared with Luxatemp and Structur. These results corroborate SEM and ATR analysis because Luxatemp sample showed a regular size particle on the surface and chemically presents a long cross-linkage polymer chain. The presence of CO 3 , SiO 2 and N–H groups as a fillers particle interacting with OH groups cause a higher flexural strength compared with another groups.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?