Abstract:Background: Disc displacement with reduction (DDwR) is among the common disc disorders of temporomandibular joint (TMJ), which can be managed conservatively by splint therapy. Anterior repositioning splint (ARS) is the most commonly prescribed splint by dental practitioners, but not getting a normal disc–condyle relationship always and other side effects lead to need of comparing with other occlusal splints. This review will help in informed decision-making by clinicians in choosing an appropriate splint type for patients. Aim: The aim is to compare the effectiveness of ARS in the management of DDwR with other occlusal splints for TMJ and muscle pain, TMJ noise, any adverse effects, regaining normal disc–condyle relationship. Materials and Methods: We followed published protocol in the International prospective register of systematic reviews. Databases were searched till May 2023 using different search strategies as per the database. Title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening and data extraction with risk of bias, was done by two independent reviewers in Covidence. Outcomes were reported as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) for dichotomous or continuous outcomes, respectively, using RevMan 5.4 (Review Manager 5.4) software. We used a random effect model for statistical analysis. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Guideline Development Tool (GRADEpro GDT) software. Results: A total of 1145 reports were found from a database search. After screening, four studies were included for systematic reviews. Other occlusal splints reported were sagittal vertical extrusion device and mandibular ARS, full hard stabilization splint of canine or centric stabilization type. Data of only two studies could be used for meta-analysis having 30 participants received ARS and 40 received other occlusal splints. We did not find evidence of any difference between ARS and other occlusal splints for TMJ clicking in short term (RR 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.72) but a small difference in favor of other occlusal splint in long term (RR 2.40, 95% CI 1.04–5.55). No evidence of any difference was found between both treatments for TMJ pain in short term (MD-5.68, 95% CI-17.31–5.95) and long term (MD 0.00, 95% CI-2.86–2.86) and muscle pain in short term. The certainty of evidence for comparison of two treatments for different outcomes was of low or very low level. Conclusion: Evidence is uncertain that other occlusal splints reduced TMJ clicking slightly in comparison to ARS. For the remaining outcomes, no evidence of any difference was found between the two splints and it may be biased due to selection bias, inadequate blinding of participants, and outcome assessor.

Evidence for minimally invasive treatment—A systematic review on surgical management of disc displacement

Arthrocentesis versus occlusal coverage splints in the management of disc displacement without reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Conservative versus Invasive Approaches in Temporomandibular Disc Displacement: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials

Treatment of painful temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Disc displacement within the human temporomandibular joint: a systematic review of a 'noisy annoyance'

Treatments for painful temporomandibular disc displacement with reduction: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Strategies to manage anterior disc displacement without reduction of temporomandibular joint: a case report

Evaluation of Clinical Impact of Two Types of Temporomandibular Joint Disc Reduction and Fixation

Clinical Protocol for Managing Acute Disc Displacement Without Reduction: a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation.

Arthroscopic Versus Open Disc Repositioning and Suturing Techniques for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Anterior Disc Displacement: 3-Year Follow-Up Study

Is There A Superiority Between Arthrocentesis And Stabilizing Occlusal Splint For The Treatment Of Anterior Disc Displacement With Reduction And Intermittent Block And Anterior Disc Displacement Without Reduction In Tmj? - Randomized Clinical Trial

A stepped approach for the management of symptomatic internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint

Surgical vs. Conservative Management of Chronic Sciatica (>3 Months) Due to Lumbar Disc Herniation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of the TMJ arthroscopy discopexy techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Diverse Therapies for Disc Displacement of Temporomandibular Joint: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Investigating of Minimally Invasive Approaches in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

Effectiveness of anterior repositioning splint versus other occlusal splints in the management of temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction: A meta-analysis

[Interventions on the intervertebral discs. Indications, techniques and evidence levels]

Arthroscopy versus arthrocentesis and versus conservative treatments for temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

[Temporomandibular joint disc surgery]

Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis