XBB.1.5‐Adapted COVID‐19 mRNA Vaccines but Not Infections With Previous Omicron Variants Boost Neutralisation Against the SARS‐CoV‐2 JN.1 Variant in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Simon Woelfel,Joel Dütschler,Daniel Junker,Marius König,Nicole Graf,Claudia Krieger,Samuel Truniger,Vasileios Oikonomou,Georg Leinenkugel,Seraina Koller,Katline Metzger‐Peter,Jacqueline Wyss,Niklas Krupka,Nicola Frei,STAR SIGN Study Investigators,Werner C. Albrich,Matthias Friedrich,Jan Hendrik Niess,Nicole Schneiderhan‐Marra,Alex Dulovic,Benjamin Misselwitz,Wolfgang Korte,Justus J. Bürgi,Stephan Brand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18349
IF: 9.524
2024-10-31
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Abstract:STAR SIGN study: Original COVID‐19 mRNA vaccines and SARS‐CoV‐2 breakthrough infections with previous omicron variants fail to protect IBD patients from highly immune‐evasive SARS‐CoV‐2 variants. Only variant‐adapted COVID‐19 vaccines provide protection against current variants and should be used as booster vaccines. Background Variant‐adapted COVID‐19 vaccines are recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, many patients rely on pre‐existing immunity by original vaccines or prior infections. Aim To assess whether such immunity sufficiently combats the highly immune‐evasive SARS‐CoV‐2 JN.1 variant. Methods Utilising two longitudinal cohorts, we evaluated immunity against JN.1 induced by original vaccines (IBD: n = 98; healthy: n = 48), omicron breakthrough infection (IBD: n = 55; healthy: n = 57) or XBB.1.5‐adapted vaccines (IBD: n = 18). Neutralisation and anti‐receptor‐binding domain (RBD) IgG levels against wild‐type SARS‐CoV‐2 and JN.1 were assessed using multiplex immunoassays. Study outcomes were wild‐type and JN.1 neutralisation following three doses of original mRNA vaccines, stratified by immunosuppressive therapy (primary outcome), and JN.1 neutralisation following third‐dose breakthrough infection or a fourth dose of XBB.1.5‐adapted mRNA vaccines (secondary outcomes). Results Following original vaccines, JN.1 neutralisation was lower than wild‐type neutralisation in all study groups (healthy, anti‐TNF and non‐anti‐TNF; each p 0.05); neutralisation failure was 100% despite breakthrough infection. XBB.1.5‐adapted vaccines enhanced JN.1 neutralisation (p
pharmacology & pharmacy,gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?