Abstract:Variation in the local thermal history during the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) process in Additive Manufacturing (AM) can cause micropore defects, which add to the uncertainty of the mechanical properties (e.g., fatigue life, tensile strength) of the built materials. In-situ sensing has been proposed for monitoring the AM process to minimize defects, but successful minimization requires establishing a quantitative relationship between the sensing data and the porosity, which is particularly challenging with a large number of variables (e.g., laser speed, power, scan path, powder property). Physics-based modeling can simulate such an in-situ sensing-porosity relationship, but it is computationally costly. In this work, we develop Machine Learning (ML) models that can use in-situ thermographic data to predict the micropore of LPBF stainless steel materials. This work considers two identified key features from the thermal histories: the time above the apparent melting threshold (τ) and the maximum radiance (Tmax). These features are computed, stored for each voxel in the built material, and then used as inputs. The binary state of each voxel, either defective or normal, is the output. Different ML models are trained and tested for the binary classification task. In addition to using the thermal features of each voxel to predict its own state, the thermal features of neighboring voxels are also included as inputs. This is shown to improve the prediction accuracy, which is consistent with thermal transport physics around each voxel contributing to its final state. Among the models trained, the F1 scores on test sets reach above 0.96 for Random Forests. Feature importance analysis based on the ML models shows that Tmax is more important to the voxel state than τ. The analysis also finds that the thermal history of the voxels above the present voxel is more influential than those beneath it. Our study significantly extends the capability of using in-situ thermographic data to predict porosity in LPBF materials. Since ML models are fast, they may play integral roles in the optimization and control of such AM technologies.

Parametric analysis and machine learning-based parametric modeling of wire laser metal deposition induced porosity

Optimizing porosity detection in wire laser metal deposition processes through data-driven AI classification techniques

Linking Process Parameters with Lack-of-Fusion Porosity for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Metal Additive Manufacturing

Hierarchical Modeling of Microstructural Images for Porosity Prediction in Metal Additive Manufacturing Via Two-Point Correlation Function

Concurrent modeling of porosity and microstructure in multilayer three-dimensional simulations of powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of INCONEL 718

Thermal Field Prediction for Welding Paths in Multi-Layer Gas Metal Arc Welding-Based Additive Manufacturing: A Machine Learning Approach

In-situ porosity prediction in metal powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using spectral emissions: a prior-guided machine learning approach

A Physics-Informed Convolutional Neural Network with Custom Loss Functions for Porosity Prediction in Laser Metal Deposition

A physics-driven deep learning model for process-porosity causal relationship and porosity prediction with interpretability in laser metal deposition

Predicting defects in laser powder bed fusion using in-situ thermal imaging data and machine learning

Predicting Laser Powder Bed Fusion Defects Through In-Process Monitoring Data and Machine Learning

Analytical Probabilistic Modeling of Additive Manufacturing-Induced Process Defects and Experimental Validation

A physics-informed machine learning model for porosity analysis in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

A deep learning framework for layer-wise porosity prediction in metal powder bed fusion using thermal signatures

Analytical prediction of keyhole porosity in laser powder bed fusion

A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Computational Modeling of the Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufacturing Process

Quantification of Interdependent Dynamics during Laser Additive Manufacturing Using X‐Ray Imaging Informed Multi‐Physics and Multiphase Simulation

An indicator of porosity through simulation of melt pool volume in aluminum wire arc additive manufacturing

Deep-learned generators of porosity distributions produced during metal Additive Manufacturing

Bead Geometry Prediction in Laser-Wire Additive Manufacturing Process Using Machine Learning: Case of Study