Abstract:Background: Ultrasound (US) can evaluate all joint components affected by knee osteoarthritis (KOA); however, standardized scoring of US-detected pathology is needed to improve its diagnostic and monitoring capabilities. Objectives: To examine the validity, reliability, and feasibility of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasound scoring for KOA, comparing with clinical and radiography measures, using predefined cutoff values. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 75 Egyptian patients with primary KOA. All patients had Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, bilateral knee radiography, and ultrasonography. Inter-observer reliability of ultrasound was evaluated in 30 knees by another newly trained operator. Results: Most of the OMERACT-US KOA scores showed significant associations with WOMAC clinical scores, except for femoral cartilage damage and effusion. The synovitis score was significantly associated with WOMAC-pain score (p-value 0.046), while medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and medial osteophytes were significantly associated with WOMAC-stiffness score (p-value 0.009 and 0.023, respectively). MME and synovitis were significantly associated with WOMAC-physical score (p-value 0.035 and 0.020, respectively). The ultrasound scores also showed a strong correlation with radiographic scoring. Inter-observer reliability ranged from moderate to excellent agreement (k = 0.58 to k = 0.83); it was highest for lateral osteophytes (k = 0.83), good agreement for synovitis (k = 0.72), any osteophytes (k = 0.71), damage of femoral cartilage (k = 0.70), and moderate agreement for medial osteophytes (k = 0.58) and MME (k = 0.59). Conclusion: OMERACT-US scoring system for KOA demonstrated validity, reliability, and feasibility for evaluating both structural and inflammatory components. Using cutoff values improved the scoring reliability for osteophytes and MME. Key Points • OMERACT-US scores provide a valid assessment of inflammatory and structural components of knee osteoarthritis. • The following changes may improve the performance of the OMERACT-US scores. a. The binary score for effusion and synovial hypertrophy can be omitted, as they have no added value. b. A semi-quantitative grading for effusion may capture the impact of effusion on clinical outcomes. c. Added cutoff values to score medial meniscal extrusion, osteophytes, and pathological effusion improved the respective scores' reliability. d. Applying the updated OMERACT definition of synovitis. • OMERACT-US scores are reliable to be used with a newly trained operator, particularly when cutoff values are included, and proper training time is provided. • The OMERACT-US score is feasible to be used in clinical practice, as the time taken to perform was short, even for a newly trained operator.

Relationship between ultrasonographic findings and subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in patients with early knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter study

A Standardized, Pragmatic Approach to Knee Ultrasound for Clinical Research in Osteoarthritis: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project

Assessing the Structural Validity of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Scale

Artificial intelligence-based analysis of lower limb muscle mass and fatty degeneration in patients with knee osteoarthritis and its correlation with Knee Society Score

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Japanese version of the new Knee Society Scoring System for osteoarthritic knee with total knee arthroplasty

The Factors Impacting on Patient-Reported Outcomes After Bicruciate-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty for Varus Knee Osteoarthritis

The MRI-detected osteophyte score is a predictor for undergoing joint replacement in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis

Association between infrapatellar fat pad ultrasound elasticity and anterior knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Association of mechanical factors with medial knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study from Matsudai Knee Osteoarthritis Survey

Utility of a simplified ultrasonography scoring system among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter cohort study

[Study on the Correlation Between Knee Osteoarthritis Imaging and Effects of Arthroscope].

Rasch Analysis for the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement Version in Individuals Awaiting Total Knee Replacement Surgery

Relationship Between the Sagittal and Coronary Alignment of the Tibiofemoral Joint and the Medial Meniscus Extrusion in Knee Osteoarthritis

Radiographic knee osteoarthritis severity has no impact on fall risk: the locomotive syndrome and health outcomes in the aizu cohort study (LOHAS): a cross-sectional study

Relationship between increased knee joint line obliquity after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and patient-reported outcome measures

Diagnostic accuracy of a novel ultrasound imaging index for knee osteoarthritis: Evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values

Comparison of MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score with Clinico-Radiological Grading

The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for lateral tibial plateau fractures- relevance, reliability and responsiveness

Assessment of validity, reliability, and feasibility of OMERACT ultrasound knee osteoarthritis scores in Egyptian patients with primary knee osteoarthritis

The course of ultrasonographic abnormalities in knee osteoarthritis: 1 year follow up

Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for KOOS After Total Knee Arthroplasty