Moral Disengagement in Adolescent Offenders: Its Relationship with Antisocial Behavior and Its Presence in Offenders of the Law and School Norms

Daniela Agudelo Rico,Carolina Panesso Giraldo,Joan Sebastian Arbeláez Caro,Germán Cabrera Gutiérrez,Valeria Isaac,María Josefina Escobar,Eduar Herrera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children11010070

2024-01-08

Children

Abstract:This study focuses on understanding the relationship between moral disengagement mechanisms in adolescents who engage in law-breaking activities and those who violate school norms. To do so, we administered the Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement Scale (MMDS), which evaluates moral justification, euphemistic labeling, advantageous comparison, deflection of responsibility, diffusion of responsibility, distortion of consequences, dehumanization, and attribution of blame, to 366 adolescents (60.1% males (n = 220) and 39.9% females (n = 146)). Our results confirmed the hypothesis that law-breaking adolescents presented a higher degree of moral disengagement than those adolescents who violate school norms. Additionally, we found that adolescents who violated school norms displayed significantly higher levels of dehumanization than the controls, and law-breaking adolescents obtained the highest score in this domain. Our findings allow us to suggest that the presence of the dehumanization mechanism in adolescents who violate school norms could be used as an early indicator of the emergence of antisocial behaviors, since this was the only component of moral disengagement that significantly differentiated this group from the controls in the study.

pediatrics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is the exploration of moral disengagement mechanisms in juvenile offenders (law violators) and adolescents who violate school rules (school norm violators) and their relationship with antisocial behavior.

Specifically, the main objectives of the study include:
1. **Comparing moral disengagement mechanisms among different groups**: By using the Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement Scale (MMDS), researchers assessed the levels of moral disengagement in three different groups: juvenile offenders in the criminal justice system, adolescents who violate school rules, and a control group (adolescents who comply with school rules).
2. **Identifying early indicators**: The study found that adolescents who violate school rules scored significantly higher in dehumanization compared to the control group, while law violators scored the highest in this aspect. This suggests that dehumanization may be an early indicator of antisocial behavior.
3. **Foundation for intervention programs**: These findings can provide evidence to support effective intervention programs aimed at preventing future delinquent behavior.

The results indicate that law violators generally scored higher on moral disengagement mechanisms compared to adolescents who violate school rules and the control group, with dehumanization showing significant differences across all groups. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the development of antisocial behavior in adolescents and provide a theoretical basis for preventive measures.