Comparing epidemiological and clinical data from RPS patients documented in a German cancer registry to a cohort from TARPSWG reference centres

Franziska Neemann,Lina Jansen,Silke Hermann,Christian Silcher,Madelaine Hettler,Peter Hohenberger,Dario Callegaro,Alessandro Gronchi,Marco Fiore,Rosalba Miceli,Frits Van Coevorden,Winan Van Houdt,Sylvie Bonvalot,Piotr Rutkowski,Jacek Skoczylas,Carol J. Swallow,Rebecca Gladdy,Dirk C. Strauss,Andrew Hayes,Mark Fairweather,Chandrajit P. Raut,Jens Jakob
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-06033-5
2024-11-29
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Abstract:Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare, heterogeneous tumours. Treatment recommendations are mainly derived from cohorts treated at reference centres. The applicability of data from cancer registries (CR) is controversial. This work compares CR and TARPSWG (Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group) data to assess the representativeness of the TARPSWG and the applicability of the CR data.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?