A proximal external focus does not benefit skilled skiers

Joseph Varga,David C. Marchant,James Hardy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2024.2407135
2024-10-03
Journal of Applied Sport Psychology
Abstract:The potential performance benefit of an external focus of attention remains unexamined for skilled junior performers, especially those executing ballistic, whole-body continuous movements. Skilled junior skiers ( M age = 14.09) completed slalom runs under external focus, internal focus, and control focus conditions. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant difference between attentional foci on performance times. Our data challenges the commonly held belief regarding the superiority of an external focus. Instead, we offer researchers and practitioners a more nuanced discussion concerning possible distance effects (proximal vs. distal) associated with external foci in skilled junior performers executing ballistic, whole-body movements. Skilled skiers completed slalom runs while focusing on rotating their skis (external), ankles (internal), and performing to their best ability (control). We uncovered no significant differences between conditions. We argue that the external focus failed to support automated processing because the attentional cue was too proximal for our skilled performers.
sport sciences,psychology, applied,hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?