Evaluating the Impact of Post-Esophagectomy Exercise on 2- and 5-Year Survival: Findings from the PERFECT Trial

David Binyam,J. K. van Vulpen,R. van Hillegersberg,J. P. Ruurda,G. A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen,E. A. Kouwenhoven,E. van der Wall,R. P. R. Groenendijk,D. L. van der Peet,C. Rosman,B. P. L. Wijnhoven,M. I. van Berge Henegouwen,H. W. M. van Laarhoven,P. D. Siersema,Anne M. May,A. E. Hiensch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003559
2024-09-18
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Abstract:ABSTRACT Purpose Despite recent treatment advances, esophageal cancer still has poor survival and a high morbidity. Exploratory evidence suggests that exercise can reduce cancer-related mortality and recurrence rates. Here, we investigated the effects of an exercise intervention in the first year after esophagectomy on survival in participants of the Physical ExeRcise Following Esophageal Cancer Treatment (PERFECT)-trial. Methods In the PERFECT-trial, esophageal cancer patients who had undergone esophagectomy were randomized to a 12-week exercise program (EX) or the control group (CG). We assessed 2- and 5-year (progression-free) survival. (Un)adjusted Cox Proportional-Hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for comparison between the trial arms. Sensitivity analyses, excluding patients with events within the exercise intervention period, were performed. Results In total, 120 participants (EX = 61; CG = 59) were included in the PERFECT-trial. After 2-year follow-up, no significant difference in the risk of death or progression between EX and CG was found (adjusted HR = 1.65, 95% CI [0.75-3.63] and 1.38, 95% CI [0.76-2.50], respectively). After excluding patients with events during the intervention period (EX = 8; CG = 4), 2-year HRs for death (1.03, 95% CI [0.41-2.56]) and progression (1.26, 95% CI [0.64-2.48]) both decreased and remained insignificant. No significant effects were found on 5-year mortality (1.03, 95% CI [0.57-1.84]) and progression (1.21, 95% CI [0.72-2.04]) either. Sensitivity-analysis resulted in attenuated 5-year HRs for mortality (0.82, 95% CI [0.42-1.58]) and progression (1.08, 95% CI [0.61-1.92]). Conclusions The results indicate no benefit of a 12-week exercise program in the first year post-esophagectomy on 2- and 5-year (progression-free) survival in esophageal cancer patients. The absence of beneficial effects may be explained by the relatively short exercise program, which was performed after treatment completion.
sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?