Association between right ventricular global longitudinal strain and mortality in intermediate‐risk pulmonary embolism

Ryan Wilson,Shunsuke Eguchi,Yoshiyuki Orihara,Michael Pfeiffer,Brandon Peterson,Mohammed Ruzieh,Zhaohui Gao,John Gorcsan III,John Boehmer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.15815
2024-04-19
Echocardiography
Abstract:Intermediate‐risk pulmonary embolism carries a significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Multiple indicators of RV function or strain have been the focus of past research to identify those at highest risk of mortality. However, there remains no single parameter to distinguish between high and low risk patients. In this study, RV global longitudinal strain demonstrated the ability to outperform other imaging and clinical parameters in this patient population and more accurately identify those at highest risk of mortality. This strongly suggests RVGLS may be an optimal tool for risk stratification. Background Right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction has been identified as a prognostic marker for adverse clinical events in patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, challenges exist in identifying RV dysfunction using conventional echocardiography techniques. Strain echocardiography is an evolving imaging modality which measures myocardial deformation and can be used as an objective index of RV systolic function. This study evaluated RV Global Longitudinal Strain (RVGLS) in patients with intermediate risk PE as a parameter of RV dysfunction, and compared to traditional echocardiographic and CT parameters evaluating short‐term mortality. Methods Retrospective single center cohort study of 251 patients with intermediate‐risk PE between 2010 and 2018. The primary outcome was all‐cause mortality at 30 days. Statistical analysis evaluated each parameter comparing survivors versus non‐survivors at 30 days. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Kaplan–Meier curves were used for comparison of the two cohorts. Results Altogether 251 patients were evaluated. Overall mortality rate was 12.4%. Utilizing an ROC curve, an absolute cutoff value of 17.7 for RVGLS demonstrated a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 70% for observed 30‐day mortality. Individuals with an RVGLS ≤17.7 had a 25 times higher mortality rate than those with RVGLS above 17.7 (HR 25.24, 95% CI = 6.0–106.4, p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?