Assessment of Potential and Techno-Economic Performance of Solid Sorbent Direct Air Capture with CO 2 Storage in Europe

Tom Terlouw,Daniel Pokras,Viola Becattini,Marco Mazzotti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c10041
IF: 11.4
2024-06-04
Environmental Science & Technology
Abstract:Direct air capture with CO(2) storage (DACCS) is among the carbon dioxide removal (CDR) options, with the largest gap between current deployment and needed upscaling. Here, we present a geospatial analysis of the techno-economic performance of large-scale DACCS deployment in Europe using two performance indicators: CDR costs and potential. Different low-temperature heat DACCS configurations are considered, i.e., coupled to the national power grid, using waste heat and powered by curtailed...
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to evaluate the large - scale deployment potential, as well as the technical and economic performance of direct air capture and carbon dioxide storage (DACCS) technology in Europe. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following points: 1. **Cost and potential of carbon capture and storage**: Explore the cost and potential of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) by analyzing the techno - economic performance of different low - temperature thermal DACCS configurations (such as coupling with the national power grid, using waste heat, or utilizing surplus electricity). 2. **Influencing factors**: - **Energy supply**: The availability of energy resources, especially the supply of electricity and waste heat. - **Climatic conditions**: The impact of climatic conditions in specific geographical locations on the performance of DACCS systems. - **Electricity price and greenhouse gas intensity**: The impact of electricity price and greenhouse gas emission intensity on the economics of DACCS systems. - **Carbon dioxide transport distance**: The impact of the transport distance from the capture point to the nearest geological storage site on the total cost. 3. **Key findings**: - **Limited availability of waste heat**: Sweden may be the only country that can offset nearly 10% of its national emissions through CDR. - **Importance of comprehensive techno - economic assessment**: Consideration of carbon dioxide transport and storage is required for a comprehensive techno - economic assessment. 4. **Geospatial analysis**: Geospatial analysis reveals significant differences between different regions, which are mainly determined by the conditions of specific geographical locations, providing important information and consistent insights for effective DACCS implementation. ### Formula presentation Some of the key formulas involved in the paper are as follows: 1. **CDR potential calculation**: \[ m_{\text{CDR}} = m_{\text{DAC}} - m_{\text{losses}} \] where \( m_{\text{CDR}} \) is the net CDR potential, \( m_{\text{DAC}} \) is the mass of captured carbon dioxide, and \( m_{\text{losses}} \) is the greenhouse gas emissions in the entire DACCS supply chain. 2. **CDR cost calculation**: \[ C_{\text{CDR}}=\frac{C_{\text{DAC}} + C_{\text{T}}+C_{\text{S}}}{m_{\text{CDR}}} \] where \( C_{\text{CDR}} \) is the total cost per ton of carbon dioxide removed, \( C_{\text{DAC}} \) is the capture cost, \( C_{\text{T}} \) is the transport cost, and \( C_{\text{S}} \) is the storage cost. 3. **Capture cost calculation**: \[ C_{\text{DAC}}=\frac{\text{Capex}_{\text{DAC}}\cdot\text{crf}+\text{Opex}_{\text{DAC}}+\text{Ele}_{\text{DAC}}\cdot\text{LCOE}+\text{Heat}_{\text{DAC}}\cdot\text{LCOH}}{8760\text{ h/year}} \] where \( \text{Capex}_{\text{DAC}} \) is the capital expenditure, \( \text{crf} \) is the recovery factor based on the country - weighted average cost of capital (WACC), \( \text{Opex}_{\text{DAC}} \) is the operating expenditure, \( \text{Ele}_{\text{DAC}} \) and \( \text{Heat}_{\text{DAC}} \) are the electricity and heat consumption required for capturing one ton of carbon dioxide respectively, and \( \text{LCOE} \) and \( \text{LCOH} \) are respectively.