Abstract:Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of industry peers in shaping firm debt maturity decisions. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use idiosyncratic equity shocks as instruments to disentangle industry fixed and peer effects. The authors also employ a three-stage least squares regression (3SLS) model to capture the correlation among thee (short, medium, and long) debt maturity decisions. Findings – The authors find that a one standard deviation change in peer short (medium, long) maturity debt leads to a 50 percent (37 percent, 23 percent) change in firm corresponding maturity debt and that these mimetic behaviors are statistically significant within, but not between, firm size groups. The findings also reveal that firms that mimic the short and medium (long) debt maturity structure of their peers tend to increase (decrease) firm performance as measured by profitability, return-on-assets, and stock returns. Research limitations/implications – First, given the research design, the authors are constraint from pinpointing the exact date of the mimicking behaviors. This limitation prevents the authors from establishing the causality of the mimicking behavior and firm performance. Future research can extend the findings by solving this problem. Second, it should be interesting to address the question of whether mimicking behavior is good or bad for firm performance. The authors only compare the performance of Close Followers and Loose Followers; however, it would be more precise to compare the performance of mimicking firms with the performance of non-mimicking firms. Originality/value – First, the findings extend the debt maturity structure literature by providing empirical evidence that an important determinant of firm debt maturity is industry peer debt maturity. Since debt maturity directly influences firm risk and performance, it is important for debt and equity holders to know how firms choose their debt maturity so that they can estimate their investment risk precisely. Second, the paper provides new empirical evidence supporting the information acquisition and principal-agent theories in demonstrating that firm performance increases when managers herd over short and medium debt maturity decisions and decreases when managers herd over long debt maturity decisions.

Peer Sentiment and Firm Production Decisions: Evidence from Homebuilders

How Does Sentiment Affect Returns of Urban Housing?

The Determinants of Homebuilder Stock Price Exposure to Lumber: Production Cost Versus Housing Demand

Peer Effects in Corporate Disclosure Decisions

Peer Effects on Real-Time Search Behavior in Experimental Stock Markets.

Industry peer effect and the maturity structure of corporate debt

Investor Sentiment, Disagreement, and Breadth-Return Relationship

Network Effects in Corporate Financial Policies

The Inventory-Sales Ratio and Homebuilder Return Predictability

Peer effects in management forecast precision decision: evidence from a novel text-based network

Quantifying Animal Spirits: News Media and Sentiment in the Housing Market

Equity Analyst Social Interactions and Geographic Information Transmission

Investor Sentiment, Disagreement, and the Breadth-Return Relationship

Market Sentiment and the Cross-section of Expected Stock Returns

Measuring the effect of investor sentiment on liquidity

Asymmetric effects of investor sentiment on industry stock returns: Panel data evidence

Peer Effects in the Trading Decisions of Individual Investors

Peer Effects and Disclosure Timing: Evidence from Earnings Announcements

Economic Policy Uncertainty and Peer Effects in Corporate Investment Policy

Peer effects on corporate environmental protection: Competition, information cascades or career concerns?

Informative or distracting: CSR disclosure of peer firms and analyst forecast accuracy