Guselkumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: QUASAR Phase 2b Induction Study

Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet,Jessica R. Allegretti,David T. Rubin,Brian Bressler,Matthew Germinaro,Kuan-Hsiang Huang,Nicole Shipitofsky,Hongyan Zhang,Rebbecca Wilson,Chenglong Han,Brian G. Feagan,William J. Sandborn,Julian Panés,Tadakazu Hisamatsu,Gary R. Lichtenstein,Bruce E. Sands,Axel Dignass,QUASAR Study Group,Orest Abrahamovych,Halyna Afanasieva,Lilia Aitova,Engin Altintas,Romain Altwegg,Pavel Andreev,Kazuki Aomatsu,Monika Augustyn,Paola Balestrieri,Jakob Begun,Luciana Brunatto,Diego Bulgheroni,Elena Bunkova,Mercedes Cabello,Qian Cao,Flavio Caprioli,Rute Cerqueira,Baili Chen,Chou-Chen Chen,Chou-Pin Chen,Cheng-Tang Chiu,Chang Hwan Choi,Michele Cicala,Olena Datsenko,Pieter Dewint,Eugeni Domenech,Joris Dutré,George Duvall,Juan Fernandez,Rafal Filip,Ronald Fogel,Sharyle Fowler,Toshimitsu Fujii,Masayuki Fukata,Yohei Furumoto,Antonio Gasbarrini,Beata Gawdis-Wojnarska,Cyrielle Gilletta,Paolo Gionchetti,Eran Goldin,Oleksandr Golovchenko,Maciej Gonciarz,Can Gonen,Gaston Gonzalez Segura,Oleksii Gridnyev,Tibor Gyokeres,Xavier Hébuterne,Charlotte Hedin,Per Hellström,Ida Normiha Hilmi,Ivo Horný,Gyula Horvat,Namiko Hoshi,Ludek Hrdlicka,Shunji Ishihara,Olha Ivanishyn,Byung Ik Jang,Odery Junior,Takashi Kagaya,Shuji Kanmura,Marina Karakina,Nakai Katsuhiko,Jaroslaw Kierkus,Hyo Jong Kim,Tae-Oh Kim,Young-Ho Kim,Gyula G. Kiss,Jochen Klaus,Dariusz Kleczkowski,Maria Klopocka,Taku Kobayashi,Iwona Kobielusz-Gembala,Ja Seol Koo,Adam Kopon,Tetiana Kravchenko,Masatoshi Kudo,Kwang An Kwon,Paula Lago,David Laharie,Ian Lawrance,Jaroslaw Leszczyszyn,Yan Li,Milan Lukas,Christian Maaser,Atsuo Maemoto,Hiroyuki Marusawa,Matthew McBride,Shoba Mendu,Pal Miheller,Hideharu Miyabayashi,Wolfgang Mohl,Gregory Moore,Satoshi Motoya,Narayanachar Murali,Mohammed Naem,Koichi Nakajima,Yasunari Nakamoto,Stéphane Nancey,Joaquim Neto,Michio Onizawa,Yohei Ono,Yohei Ono,Taro Osada,Marina Osipenko,Danuta Owczarek,Bhaktasharan Patel,Kamal Patel,Elina Petrova,Elena Poroshina,Francisco Portela,Lyudmyla Prystupa,Monserrat Rivero,Xavier Roblin,Jacek Romatowski,Grazyna Rydzewska,Simone Saibeni,Hirotake Sakuraba,Mark Samaan,Michael Schultz,Joerg Schulze,Shahriar Sedghi,Ursula Seidler,Sung Jae Shin,Mykola Stanislavchuk,David Stokesberry,Takayoshi Suzuki,Hiroki Taguchi,Lyudmila Tankova,Lena Thin,Alexander Tkachev,Leyanira Torrealba,Nataliia Tsarynna,Zsolt Tulassay,Tetsuya Ueo,Ekaterina Valuyskikh,Olga Vasilevskaya,Manuel Viamonte,Shu-Chen Wei,Roni Weisshof,Katarzyna Wojcik,Byong Duk Ye,Hsu-Heng Yen,Hyuk Yoon,Kosuke Yoshida,Andriy Yurkiv,Osamu Zaha,Qiang Zhan,Kuan-Hsiang (Gary) Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.038
IF: 29.4
2023-09-01
Gastroenterology
Abstract:BACKGROUND & AIMS: <AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND & AIMS" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The QUASAR Phase 2b Induction Study evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an interleukin-23p19 subunit antagonist, in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) with prior inadequate response and/or intolerance to corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and/or advanced therapy.</AbstractText>METHODS: <AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, induction study, patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive intravenous guselkumab 200 or 400 mg or placebo at weeks 0/4/8. The primary endpoint was clinical response (compared with baseline, modified Mayo score decrease ≥30% and ≥2 points, rectal bleeding subscore ≥1-point decrease or subscore of 0/1) at week 12. Guselkumab and placebo week-12 clinical nonresponders received subcutaneous or intravenous guselkumab 200 mg, respectively, at weeks 12/16/20 (uncontrolled study period).</AbstractText>RESULTS: <AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The primary analysis population included patients with baseline modified Mayo scores ≥5 and ≤9 (intravenous guselkumab 200 mg, n = 101; 400 mg, n = 107; placebo, n = 105). Week-12 clinical response percentage was greater with guselkumab 200 mg (61.4%) and 400 mg (60.7%) vs placebo (27.6%; both P < .001). Greater proportions of guselkumab-treated vs placebo-treated patients achieved all major secondary endpoints (clinical remission, symptomatic remission, endoscopic improvement, histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement, and endoscopic normalization) at week 12. Among guselkumab week-12 clinical nonresponders, 54.3% and 50.0% of patients in the 200- and 400-mg groups, respectively, achieved clinical response at week 24. Safety was similar among guselkumab and placebo groups.</AbstractText>CONCLUSIONS: <AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Guselkumab intravenous induction was effective vs placebo in patients with moderately to severely active UC. Guselkumab was safe, and efficacy and safety were similar between guselkumab dose groups.</AbstractText>CLINICALTRIALS: <AbstractText Label="CLINICALTRIALS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">gov number: NCT04033445.</AbstractText>
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?