Updated Estimate of the Number of ERPOs Needed to Prevent 1 Suicide

Matthew Miller,Yifan Zhang,David M. Studdert,Sonja Swanson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14864

2024-06-13

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:This cohort study uses data for handgun owners in California who died by suicide and for extreme risk protection order (ERPO) respondents in Connecticut who died by suicide to estimate of the number of ERPOs needed to prevent 1 suicide.

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve

The paper aims to update the estimated number of Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) needed to prevent one suicide. ERPOs, also known as red flag orders, risk warrants, and gun violence restraining orders, authorize law enforcement, family members, and other concerned individuals to petition a court to remove and prohibit individuals deemed to pose an immediate danger to themselves or others from possessing or purchasing firearms.

### Background and Research Objectives

1. **Background**:
- Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) are civil court orders designed to temporarily prevent someone from purchasing or possessing firearms and ammunition.
- Previous research suggested that issuing 10 ERPOs could prevent 1 suicide, but this number relies on hypothetical counterfactual estimates of how many suicides would involve firearms in the absence of ERPOs.

2. **Research Objectives**:
- To re-estimate the number of ERPOs needed to prevent one suicide by combining data on suicide methods among legal handgun owners in California, lethality data for different suicide methods, and the distribution of suicide deaths among ERPO respondents in Connecticut.
- To provide an updated estimate based on empirical data to evaluate the effectiveness of ERPOs in preventing suicides among high-risk individuals.

### Research Design and Methods

1. **Data Sources**:
- Personal registration data of over 25 million adults in California from October 18, 2004, to December 31, 2015, including legal handgun ownership and cause-specific mortality data.
- Suicide death data among ERPO respondents in Connecticut from October 1999 to June 2013.

2. **Primary Outcome Measures**:
- The primary outcomes are the number and distribution of suicides among handgun owners in California and the counterfactual number of suicides and deaths among Connecticut ERPO respondents if they had not been affected by ERPOs.

### Research Results

1. **Suicide Behavior Among California Handgun Owners**:
- During the study period, 1216 handgun owners (average age 50 years, 83.8% male) died by suicide.
- Of these, 28% involved firearms, 54% involved drug poisoning, 9% involved cutting or stabbing, 3% involved hanging or asphyxiation, 2% involved solid or liquid poisoning, and the remaining 4% involved other methods.

2. **Suicide Prevention Among Connecticut ERPO Respondents**:
- Assuming the distribution of suicide methods among Connecticut ERPO respondents is similar to that of California handgun owners, issuing 22 ERPOs could prevent one suicide death.

### Conclusions and Significance

1. **Conclusions**:
- The results of this cohort study indicate that issuing 22 ERPOs could prevent one suicide death.
- These findings suggest that ERPOs can play a significant role in preventing suicides among high-risk individuals.

2. **Significance**:
- This study provides an updated estimate based on empirical data, which can help policymakers use ERPOs more effectively and equitably.
- Future research can further explore the effectiveness of different ERPO implementation methods to guide policy and legislative decisions.

### Limitations

1. **Limitations of Absolute Values**:
- The NNT (number needed to treat) of 22 is just one of many considerations in evaluating the potential risks and benefits of ERPO laws.
- Other potential benefits, such as preventing homicides and mass shootings, alleviating the burden on the families and friends of individuals in crisis, and potential harms, such as infringements on liberty rights and risks during firearm removal by law enforcement, need to be considered.

2. **Variability in Implementation Effectiveness**:
- The effectiveness of ERPOs may vary depending on the method, location, and reasons for implementation, such as the risk level of the target population, the number of individuals targeted, and other contextual factors related to reducing access to firearms.

3. **Limitations of Assumptions**:
- The study results are based on three assumptions, including using published method-specific case fatality rates (CFR) to estimate the number of suicide attempts, assuming that ERPO-related firearm removal only affects the distribution of suicide methods and not the number of suicide attempts, and assuming that the distribution of suicide methods among legal handgun owners in California can reasonably approximate that of Connecticut ERPO respondents.