Abstract:Do people have well-defined social preferences waiting to be applied when making decisions? Or do they have to construct social decisions on the spot? If the latter, how are those decisions influenced by the way in which information is acquired and evaluated? These temporal dynamics are fundamental to understanding how people trade off selfishness and prosociality in organizations and societies. Here, we investigate how the temporal dynamics of the choice process shape social decisions in three studies using response times and mouse tracking. In the first study, participants made binary decisions in mini-dictator games with and without time constraints. Using mouse trajectories and a starting time drift diffusion model, we find that, regardless of time constraints, selfish participants were delayed in processing others’ payoffs, whereas the opposite was true for prosocial participants. The independent mouse trajectory and computational modeling analyses identified consistent measures of the delay between considering one’s own and others’ payoffs (self-onset delay, SOD). This measure correlated with individual differences in prosociality and predicted heterogeneous effects of time constraints on preferences. We confirmed these results in two additional studies, one a purely behavioral study in which participants made decisions by pressing computer keys, and the other a replication of the mouse-tracking study. Together, these results indicate that people preferentially process either self or others’ payoffs early in the choice process. The intrachoice dynamics are crucial in shaping social preferences and might be manipulated via nudge policies (e.g., manipulating the display order or saliency of self and others’ outcomes) for behavior in managerial or other contexts. This paper was accepted by Yan Chen, behavioral economics and decisions analysis. Funding: F. Chen acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 71803174 and 72173113]. Z. Zhu acknowledges support from the Ministry of Science and Technology [Grant STI 2030-Major Projects 2021ZD0200409]. Q. Shen acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 71971199 and 71942004]. I. Krajbich acknowledges support from the U.S. National Science Foundation [Grant 2148982]. This work was also supported by the James McKeen Cattell Fund. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4732 .

Collective incentives reduce over-exploitation of social information in unconstrained human groups

Collective decision-making under changing social environments among agents adapted to sparse connectivity

Flexible social inference facilitates targeted social learning when rewards are not observable

Visual-spatial dynamics drive adaptive social learning in immersive environments

Incentivizing free riders improves collective intelligence in social dilemmas

Agents seeking long-term access to the wisdom of the crowd reduce immediate decision-making accuracy

Collective Behavior Decision Based on Edge Dynamics

Strategic formation of collaborative networks

Information socialtaxis and efficient collective behavior emerging in groups of information-seeking agents

Information Synergy Maximizes the Growth Rate of Heterogeneous Groups

Does Spending More Always Ensure Higher Cooperation? An Analysis of Institutional Incentives on Heterogeneous Networks

Confidence over competence: Real-time integration of social information in human continuous perceptual decision-making

A Cognitive Computational Approach to Social and Collective Decision-Making

Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward

A multi-agent reinforcement learning model of reputation and cooperation in human groups

Collective action within an environment of unknown unknowns: Experiences with the port of Mars Game

Flocking in complex environments -- attention trade-offs in collective information processing

Using deep reinforcement learning to promote sustainable human behaviour on a common pool resource problem

Intrachoice Dynamics Shape Social Decisions

Collective intelligence: aggregation of information from neighbors in a guessing game