Abstract:China embarked on the implementation of a comprehensive national strategy aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2020, with ambitious targets to achieve peak emissions by 2030 and attain carbon neutrality by 2060. Given the challenges, thoroughly investigating China's carbon emissions status and outlining reduction pathways for each province is crucial. Based on calculating carbon emissions in Jiangsu Province, this article uses the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) model to decompose and analyze the factors that affect carbon emissions. This article starts with provincial carbon emissions to find the core factors and then narrows the research scope to the city level to make carbon reduction policies more targeted. When decomposing carbon emissions, this article not only selects energy structure, energy efficiency, economic development, population size, and industrial structure factors commonly used in the LMDI model but also adds the factor of external electricity to research indirect carbon emissions. The final conclusions mainly include the following: firstly, the economic development and energy efficiency factors in Jiangsu Province are the core influencing factors for carbon emissions. The former promotes carbon emissions, while the latter reduces it, and the impact gradually weakens. The energy structure and industrial structure have reduced carbon emissions, while population size and electricity transfer have increased carbon emissions. Furthermore, notable disparities in carbon emissions exist among cities within Jiangsu Province, with varying impacts stemming from diverse driving factors. Upon comprehensive evaluation of the collective carbon reduction impact, Nanjing and Suzhou emerge as cities with a low contribution rate attributable to their industrial structure. Wuxi, Zhenjiang, and Xuzhou, on the other hand, exhibit a low contribution rate associated with their energy structure. Taizhou and Nantong demonstrate a low contribution rate in energy efficiency, while Changzhou, Huai'an, and Yangzhou display a low contribution rate in both industry and energy structure. Lianyungang, Suqian, and Yancheng present low contribution rates across all three factors. Recognizing the distinctive energy and industrial profiles of each city, governmental policies should be formulated with uniformity, fairness, and flexibility, effectively realizing the dual carbon objectives.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to further narrow the research scope by analyzing the characteristics of carbon emission driving factors in different cities in Jiangsu province, so as to solve the problems of ambiguity in formulating carbon reduction policies and ignoring the uniqueness of each city due to the large research scope. In addition, the paper will also consider the indirect carbon emissions represented by power inflows, analyze the impact of this factor on overall carbon emissions, and achieve better carbon reduction effects through coordinating power inflows. Specifically: 1. **Refine the research scope**: Starting from the characteristics of carbon emission driving factors in different cities, solve the current problems of ambiguity in formulating carbon reduction policies and ignoring the uniqueness of each city due to the large research scope. 2. **Consider indirect carbon emissions**: Introduce power inflows as a factor affecting carbon emissions, analyze its impact on overall carbon emissions, and thus put forward more specific carbon reduction suggestions. 3. **Provide targeted suggestions**: Through the decomposition analysis of carbon emission driving factors in different cities, put forward specific emission reduction suggestions for cities with different carbon emission characteristics, enabling each city to formulate more targeted carbon reduction strategies. ### Main contributions 1. **Introduction of power transfer factors**: Power transfers between provinces and cities are very common, but there are relatively few studies on the impact of power inflows on carbon emissions. Therefore, this paper incorporates the power inflow factor into the driving factor decomposition process for the first time, filling this research gap. 2. **Analysis from a spatio - temporal perspective**: Due to the significant differences in internal development and carbon emissions in Jiangsu province, in order to provide more targeted, fair, and flexible suggestions, this paper analyzes the decomposition results from a spatio - temporal perspective, hoping to put forward different suggestions for cities with different carbon emission characteristics, so that each city can formulate more targeted carbon reduction strategies. ### Research methods 1. **Data collection and processing**: Collect and process energy consumption data, select nine energy types, including raw coal, coke, crude oil, gasoline, kerosene, diesel, fuel oil, liquefied petroleum gas, and electricity. Convert the data into standard coal units and calculate using the carbon emission factors in the IPCC emission inventory. 2. **Carbon emission calculation model**: Adopt the carbon emission factor calculation model to calculate direct and indirect carbon emissions through energy consumption and emission factors. 3. **LMDI model**: Use the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) model to decompose carbon emission driving factors and evaluate the contribution of each factor to carbon emission changes. ### Formulas The carbon emission calculation formula is as follows: \[ C = C_a + C_b \] where: - \( C_a \) represents direct carbon emissions - \( C_b \) represents indirect carbon emissions The formula for calculating direct carbon emissions: \[ C_a=\sum_{i = 1}^{n} SQ_i\times CEC_i \] where: - \( n \) represents the number of energy types - \( SQ_i \) represents the consumption of the \( i \) - th energy type - \( CEC_i \) represents the carbon emission index of the \( i \) - th energy type The formula for calculating indirect carbon emissions: \[ C_b=\sum_{j = 1}^{m} E_j\times EF_j \] where: - \( m \) represents the number of power types - \( E_j \) represents the external input amount of the \( j \) - th power type - \( EF_j \) represents the carbon emission index of the \( j \) - th power type Through these methods and models, the paper aims to provide valuable suggestions for decision - makers to help Jiangsu province achieve sustainable development and mitigate the impact of climate change.

Carbon Emissions Drivers and Reduction Strategies in Jiangsu Province

Peak Volume and Time of Energy-Related CO2 Emissions in Jiangsu Province, China Based on Long-Range Energy Alternatives Planning System Model

Analysis of Urban Carbon Reducing Pressure and Potential of Jiangsu Province

Research on Carbon Peak Prediction of Various Prefecture-Level Cities in Jiangsu Province Based on Factors Influencing Carbon Emissions

Driving factors of total carbon emissions from the construction industry in Jiangsu Province, China

The impacts of driving variables on energy-related carbon emissions reduction in the building sector based on an extended LMDI model: a case study in China

Driving Forces of Carbon Emissions in China: a Provincial Analysis

Spatiotemporal pattern and coordinating development characteristics of carbon emission performance and land use intensity in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration

Decomposed Driving Factors of Carbon Emissions and Scenario Analyses of Low-Carbon Transformation in 2020 and 2030 for Zhejiang Province

Effects of Carbon Emissions and Their Spatio-Temporal Patterns in Jiangsu Province from 1996 to 2007

What is driving CO2 emissions in a typical manufacturing center of South China? The case of Jiangsu Province

Carbon emission and its decoupling research of transportation in Jiangsu Province

Carbon emissions from land use in Jiangsu, China, and analysis of the regional interactions

ENERGY DEMAND FORECAST AND CO2 MITIGATION IN JIANGSU PROVINCE

Evaluation and prediction of carbon emission from logistics at city scale for low-carbon development strategy

Research on the control path and countermeasures of net CO2 emissions in central China – represented by Jiangxi Province

Research on Low-Carbon Building Development and Carbon Emission Control Based on Mathematical Models: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province

An integrated economic, energy, and environmental analysis to optimize evaluation of carbon reduction strategies at the regional level: A case study in Zhejiang, China

Multi-sectoral decomposition in decoupling industrial growth from carbon emissions in the developed Jiangsu Province, China

Spatial and Temporal Characteristics and Drivers of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in Jiangsu Province, China

Regional Carbon Emission Inventory Estmimation and Reduction Potential Analysis in Jiangsu Province